Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Cape Town using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Heerden Ingram's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Heerden Ingram's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Heerden Ingram's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Heerden Ingram's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:53 | 04:13 to 02:20 | 40.9% |
| Run Total | 01:35 | 39:42 to 38:07 | 34.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:39 | 02:27 to 01:48 | 14.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:27 | 04:40 to 04:13 | 9.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:01 | 04:03 to 04:02 | 0.4% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:33 to 04:32 | 0.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Van Heerden Ingram | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:04 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 05:04 | 04:19 +00:21 | 04:18 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 04:43 | 09:44 | 04:37 +00:06 | 08:37 +01:07 |
| Sled Push | 04:13 | 14:27 | 02:39 +01:34 | 13:14 +01:13 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 18:40 | 04:59 +00:00 | 15:53 +02:47 |
| Sled Pull | 04:03 | 23:39 | 04:25 -00:22 | 20:52 +02:47 |
| Running 4 | 04:55 | 27:42 | 04:58 -00:03 | 25:17 +02:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:55 | 32:37 | 04:36 -00:41 | 30:15 +02:22 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 36:32 | 05:06 -00:07 | 34:51 +01:41 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 41:31 | 04:38 -00:05 | 39:57 +01:34 |
| Running 6 | 04:53 | 46:04 | 04:59 -00:06 | 44:35 +01:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 50:57 | 02:00 +00:27 | 49:34 +01:23 |
| Running 7 | 04:45 | 53:24 | 04:58 -00:13 | 51:34 +01:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:12 | 58:09 | 04:32 -00:20 | 56:32 +01:37 |
| Running 8 | 05:28 | 01:02:21 | 05:26 +00:02 | 01:01:04 +01:17 |
| Wall Balls | 05:05 | 01:07:49 | 05:42 -00:37 | 01:06:30 +01:19 |
| Roxzone | 05:20 | 01:18:06 | 05:54 -00:34 | 01:18:06 |
Ingram Van Heerden delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Cape Town HYROX event, securing an overall rank of 55, placing him in the top 13% of 394 athletes and 10th in his age group. His overall finish time was 01:18:06, demonstrating a strong balance between running and strength exercises. Notably, his total running time was 00:39:42, faster than the average by 00:02, indicating a slight edge in running capability.
Analyzing his pacing, it appears Ingram started slightly slower in his initial running segments but picked up pace significantly as the race progressed. This suggests a conservative start, potentially to conserve energy for later stages. His profile leans towards a hybrid athlete, showcasing a good mix of running efficiency and strength, although with a slight inclination towards running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Murray Glenn | 2022 London | 01:17:48 | |
| Kenning Dylan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:19 | |
| Evans Matt | 2023 Singapore | 01:17:58 | |
| Beckers Andre | 2024 Hamburg | 01:18:07 | |
| Antelo Jose | 2023 Barcelona | 01:17:47 | |
| Thrasyvoulou Costa | 2024 London | 01:17:46 | |
| Hajdari Blend | 2024 Dubai | 01:18:28 | |
| Rosella Luigi | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:17:36 | |
| Romero Omar | 2022 Dallas | 01:18:29 | |
| Lücke Leon | 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
