Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Heermann Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Heermann Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Heermann Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Heermann Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:19 | 08:09 to 05:50 | 52.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:42 | 05:02 to 04:20 | 15.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:23 | 04:52 to 04:29 | 8.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:21 | 02:58 to 02:37 | 7.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:16 | 05:04 to 04:48 | 6.0% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:54 to 04:41 | 4.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:12 | 04:52 to 04:40 | 4.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:26 to 39:26 | 0.0% |
| Heermann Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:35 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:02 | 04:35 | 04:24 +00:38 | 04:33 +00:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:28 | 09:37 | 04:52 -00:24 | 08:57 +00:40 |
| Sled Push | 02:58 | 14:05 | 02:52 +00:06 | 13:49 +00:16 |
| Running 3 | 04:50 | 17:03 | 05:18 -00:28 | 16:41 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 21:53 | 04:48 +00:04 | 21:59 -00:06 |
| Running 4 | 04:51 | 26:45 | 05:15 -00:24 | 26:47 -00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:04 | 31:36 | 05:07 -00:03 | 32:02 -00:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:06 | 36:40 | 05:26 -00:20 | 37:09 -00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 41:46 | 04:46 +00:08 | 42:35 -00:49 |
| Running 6 | 04:57 | 46:40 | 05:18 -00:21 | 47:21 -00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 51:37 | 02:08 -00:17 | 52:39 -01:02 |
| Running 7 | 04:53 | 53:28 | 05:17 -00:24 | 54:47 -01:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:52 | 58:21 | 04:56 -00:04 | 01:00:04 -01:43 |
| Running 8 | 05:50 | 01:03:13 | 05:51 -00:01 | 01:05:00 -01:47 |
| Wall Balls | 08:09 | 01:09:03 | 06:16 +01:53 | 01:10:51 -01:48 |
| Roxzone | 06:39 | 01:23:44 | 06:37 +00:02 | 01:23:44 |
Tim Heermann delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Stuttgart Hyrox event, finishing in the top 26% of all athletes. Notably, his total running time was 02:43 faster than average, indicating a strong running capability. Tim's pacing strategy appears well-calibrated, maintaining a consistent performance across the initial running segments. His running splits suggest he started slightly conservative in Running 1 but quickly found his rhythm, outperforming the average in subsequent segments. Overall, Tim demonstrates a runner profile with room for improvement in strength-oriented activities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Callaghan Aaron | 2024 Bilbao | 01:23:54 | |
| Seo Kyung Pyo | 2024 Singapore | 01:23:38 | |
| Cabiddu Ivan | 2023 Rimini | 01:23:26 | |
| Prini Alessandro | 2024 Rimini | 01:23:42 | |
| Nieto Mauricio | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:23:55 | |
| Teatiu Florian | 2018 Hamburg | 01:23:29 | |
| Paul Ludovic | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:19 | |
| Mcdonald Andrew | 2024 Perth | 01:23:59 | |
| Mendrys Ben | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:23:51 | |
| Minutolo Davide | 2024 Rimini | 01:23:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 München | 01:32:18 | |
| 2023 Frankfurt | 01:24:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
