Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fitzgerald Tracey's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fitzgerald Tracey's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fitzgerald Tracey's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fitzgerald Tracey's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:07 | 07:13 to 06:06 | 30.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 07:33 to 06:45 | 21.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:46 | 05:57 to 05:11 | 20.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 03:27 to 02:54 | 14.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 02:49 to 02:20 | 13.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:22 to 46:22 | 0.0% |
| Fitzgerald Tracey | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:35 | 00:00 | 05:29 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:08 | 05:35 | 05:17 -00:09 | 05:29 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 10:43 | 05:51 -00:23 | 10:46 -00:03 |
| Sled Push | 03:27 | 16:11 | 02:59 +00:28 | 16:37 -00:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 19:38 | 06:14 -00:39 | 19:36 +00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 07:13 | 25:13 | 06:19 +00:54 | 25:50 -00:37 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 32:26 | 06:12 -00:34 | 32:09 +00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:33 | 38:04 | 07:05 +00:28 | 38:21 -00:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:49 | 45:37 | 06:25 -00:36 | 45:26 +00:11 |
| Rowing | 05:22 | 51:26 | 05:36 -00:14 | 51:51 -00:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:47 | 56:48 | 06:17 -00:30 | 57:27 -00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:49 | 01:02:35 | 02:26 +00:23 | 01:03:44 -01:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:44 | 01:05:24 | 06:16 -00:32 | 01:06:10 -00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:57 | 01:11:08 | 05:22 +00:35 | 01:12:26 -01:18 |
| Running 8 | 06:49 | 01:17:05 | 06:53 -00:04 | 01:17:48 -00:43 |
| Wall Balls | 04:25 | 01:23:54 | 05:46 -01:21 | 01:24:41 -00:47 |
| Roxzone | 10:05 | 01:38:18 | 07:51 +02:14 | 01:38:18 |
Tracey Fitzgerald delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX race, securing an overall rank of 454 out of 1801 athletes, placing her in the top 25%. Within her age group (40-44), she ranked 67th among 317 competitors, entering the top 21%. Her overall time was 01:38:18, with a total running time of 00:46:22, which was 03:58 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. This suggests that while Tracey excels in running, she could benefit from enhancing her strength-based performance. The initial running segments indicate that Tracey maintained a consistent pace, starting slightly slower but quickly surpassing the average times in subsequent runs, demonstrating good pacing strategy.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hein Alexandra | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:38:48 | |
| Syms Emily | 2024 London | 01:38:35 | |
| Batterham Charlotte | 2024 London | 01:38:01 | |
| Mclaren Jill | 2024 London | 01:38:44 | |
| Crown Katie | 2024 Dublin | 01:37:51 | |
| Bianchi Vanessa | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:38:22 | |
| Antoine Leanne | 2021 London | 01:38:24 | |
| Porykali Monai | 2024 Melbourne | 01:38:22 | |
| Szabo Eni | 2021 London | 01:38:15 | |
| Clarke Judith | 2024 Stockholm | 01:38:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Perth | 01:36:49 | |
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:56:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
