Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Phillips Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Phillips Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Phillips Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Phillips Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:56 | 39:51 to 37:55 | 35.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:12 | 05:22 to 04:10 | 22.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:06 | 05:15 to 04:09 | 20.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:59 | 06:08 to 05:09 | 18.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:22 to 04:12 | 3.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:01 | 04:01 to 04:00 | 0.3% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:32 to 04:31 | 0.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 01:49 to 01:48 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Phillips Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:32 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 03:32 | 04:19 +00:03 | 04:18 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 04:59 | 07:54 | 04:36 +00:23 | 08:37 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 12:53 | 02:38 -00:25 | 13:13 -00:20 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 15:06 | 04:59 +00:00 | 15:51 -00:45 |
| Sled Pull | 04:01 | 20:05 | 04:24 -00:23 | 20:50 -00:45 |
| Running 4 | 05:04 | 24:06 | 04:57 +00:07 | 25:14 -01:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:15 | 29:10 | 04:36 +00:39 | 30:11 -01:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:12 | 34:25 | 05:06 +00:06 | 34:47 -00:22 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 39:37 | 04:38 -00:06 | 39:53 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 44:09 | 04:59 +00:00 | 44:31 -00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 49:08 | 01:59 -00:10 | 49:30 -00:22 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 50:57 | 04:58 +00:07 | 51:29 -00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:22 | 56:02 | 04:32 +00:50 | 56:27 -00:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:05 | 01:01:24 | 05:25 +00:40 | 01:00:59 +00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 06:08 | 01:07:29 | 05:42 +00:26 | 01:06:24 +01:05 |
| Roxzone | 04:28 | 01:17:58 | 05:52 -01:24 | 01:17:58 |
Luke Phillips delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Sydney Hyrox race, placing in the top 22% overall and within his age group. Despite a strong start, his total running time was 11 seconds slower than average, indicating potential for improvement in his running efficiency. The initial running segment was notably fast, suggesting that he may have started too quickly and consequently slowed down in subsequent segments. His performance in strength-based exercises, such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, was above average, highlighting his strength-oriented profile. However, there is room for improvement in hybrid exercises like Burpees Broad Jump and Sandbag Lunges, which could enhance his overall race time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Littlejohn Guy | 2024 Köln | 01:17:44 | |
| Halpin Jack | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:43 | |
| Guthrie Steve | 2024 Malaga | 01:17:58 | |
| Melarkey Ben | 2024 Madrid | 01:18:26 | |
| Ebel Yann | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:18:01 | |
| Kershaw Daniel | 2024 Köln | 01:17:29 | |
| Kügler Andreas | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:17:34 | |
| Zanelli Alexandre | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:17:30 | |
| Roberts Stuart | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:08 | |
| Burdall James | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:18:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Brisbane | 01:21:22 | |
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:41:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
