Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Phillips Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Phillips Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Phillips Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Phillips Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:38 | 06:12 to 04:34 | 38.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:37 | 06:06 to 04:29 | 38.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:48 | 06:23 to 05:35 | 18.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:03 to 01:55 | 3.1% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:40 to 04:37 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:43 to 39:43 | 0.0% |
| Phillips Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:03 | 00:00 | 04:26 -01:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 03:03 | 04:23 -00:10 | 04:26 -01:23 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 07:16 | 04:46 -00:01 | 08:49 -01:33 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 12:01 | 02:45 -00:17 | 13:35 -01:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 14:29 | 05:09 -00:05 | 16:20 -01:51 |
| Sled Pull | 04:03 | 19:33 | 04:39 -00:36 | 21:29 -01:56 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 23:36 | 05:07 +00:03 | 26:08 -02:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:12 | 28:46 | 04:57 +01:15 | 31:15 -02:29 |
| Running 5 | 05:12 | 34:58 | 05:17 -00:05 | 36:12 -01:14 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 40:10 | 04:43 -00:03 | 41:29 -01:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:35 | 44:50 | 05:10 +00:25 | 46:12 -01:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 50:25 | 02:04 -00:01 | 51:22 -00:57 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 52:28 | 05:08 +00:16 | 53:26 -00:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:06 | 57:52 | 04:49 +01:17 | 58:34 -00:42 |
| Running 8 | 05:32 | 01:03:58 | 05:38 -00:06 | 01:03:23 +00:35 |
| Wall Balls | 06:23 | 01:09:30 | 06:03 +00:20 | 01:09:01 +00:29 |
| Roxzone | 05:36 | 01:21:22 | 06:18 -00:42 | 01:21:22 |
Luke Phillips delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, ranking in the top 19% overall and in the top 17% within his age group. His overall time was 01:21:22, showcasing a well-rounded capability in both running and strength components. Notably, his total running time of 00:39:43 was faster than average by 01:23, indicating a strong running profile. Despite his strength in running, he experienced a dip in performance during the later stages of running, suggesting potential fatigue or pacing issues. Luke began the event with a notably fast start, as seen in Running 1, but his pace slowed down in subsequent segments, indicating that he might have started too fast. His strength exercises, particularly in Burpees Broad Jump, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls, show room for improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Huber André | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:21:33 | |
| Lenihan Michael | 2021 Dallas | 01:21:17 | |
| Regino Michael | 2024 Brisbane | 01:20:52 | |
| Garcia Nick | 2023 Houston | 01:20:59 | |
| Gillie Liam | 2023 Glasgow | 01:21:36 | |
| Samorski Jost Benedikt | 2018 Leipzig | 01:21:48 | |
| Dufresne Rémi | 2024 Milan | 01:21:40 | |
| Kitson Jack | 2024 London | 01:20:58 | |
| Ennayar Hatim | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:20:58 | |
| Augustijn André | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sydney | 01:17:58 | |
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:41:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
