Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 746 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 05:20 (From 11:23 to 06:03) | 72.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:07 (From 06:44 to 05:37) | 15.1% |
| BBJ | 00:56 (From 08:22 to 07:26) | 12.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 05:07 to 05:07) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:51 to 02:51) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 06:17 to 06:17) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:07 to 05:07) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:04 to 02:04) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 49:41 to 49:41) | 0.0% |
| Grist Phoebe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:42 | 00:00 | 05:37 -00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 04:42 | 05:23 -00:16 | 05:37 -00:55 |
| Running 2 | 05:47 | 09:49 | 06:08 -00:21 | 11:00 -01:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:51 | 15:36 | 03:07 -00:16 | 17:08 -01:32 |
| Running 3 | 06:18 | 18:27 | 06:31 -00:13 | 20:15 -01:48 |
| Sled Pull | 06:17 | 24:45 | 06:46 -00:29 | 26:46 -02:01 |
| Running 4 | 06:33 | 31:02 | 06:34 -00:01 | 33:32 -02:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:22 | 37:35 | 07:39 +00:43 | 40:06 -02:31 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 45:57 | 06:45 -00:11 | 47:45 -01:48 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 52:31 | 05:42 -00:35 | 54:30 -01:59 |
| Running 6 | 06:00 | 57:38 | 06:39 -00:39 | 01:00:12 -02:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 01:03:38 | 02:33 -00:29 | 01:06:51 -03:13 |
| Running 7 | 06:20 | 01:05:42 | 06:37 -00:17 | 01:09:24 -03:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:44 | 01:12:02 | 05:46 +00:58 | 01:16:01 -03:59 |
| Running 8 | 07:31 | 01:18:46 | 07:26 +00:05 | 01:21:47 -03:01 |
| Wall Balls | 11:23 | 01:26:17 | 06:09 +05:14 | 01:29:13 -02:56 |
| Roxzone | 06:21 | 01:43:52 | 08:30 -02:09 | 01:43:52 |
Phoebe Grist has shown commendable performance in the 2024 Paris HYROX event, securing a place in the top 22% of 2328 athletes. She particularly excelled in the running segments, where her total running time was 03:02 faster than the average, signifying her strength in running. Her best running lap time of 00:05:47 is indicative of her speed and endurance.
Phoebe started strong, with her performance in the initial running segments being faster than the average. This indicates a solid start but also raises the question of pacing, as starting too fast can lead to energy depletion in the later stages of the race. Despite this, Phoebe seems to have balanced her energy well, as she also finished strong in the final running segments.
Phoebe's above-average performance in the roxzone suggests good overall fitness and effective transition time. However, her performance in strength-based exercises like Wall Balls, Burpees Broad Jump, and Sandbag Lunges was slower than average, indicating that these areas require focused attention and training.
For better performance in future races, Phoebe should consider adjusting her pacing strategy. While her quick start serves her well in the initial stages, conserving some energy for the more strength-based exercises towards the end could result in a better overall performance. More specifically, she might want to slow down slightly in the running segments following strength-based exercises, allowing for better recovery.
Phoebe should also consider incorporating more strength training into her routine to balance out her evident running prowess. By improving her strength, she could greatly enhance her performance in the strength-based segments and thus her overall race time.
Lastly, practicing transitions between running and strength-based exercises could help shave off valuable seconds from her overall time. This involves not just physical training, but also strategic planning to ensure smooth transitions between different types of exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ras Veronique | 2023 Malmö | 01:43:42 | |
| Scott Courtney | 2023 Glasgow | 01:44:05 | |
| Cronen Silke | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:44:10 | |
| Groenheide Brigitte | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:43:41 | |
| Rousseau Bonnie | 2020 Chicago | 01:44:15 | |
| Moody Lynsey | 2024 Glasgow | 01:43:47 | |
| Dielen Liselot | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:43:40 | |
| Slater Selina | 2024 London | 01:43:35 | |
| Hristova Yoana | 2022 London | 01:43:54 | |
| Aspholm Annika | 2024 Stockholm | 01:44:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Grist Phoebe
