Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Barstow Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Barstow Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Barstow Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Barstow Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:34 | 09:40 to 06:06 | 54.5% |
| Run Total | 02:48 | 49:06 to 46:18 | 42.7% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:06 to 05:00 | 1.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 05:47 to 05:43 | 1.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:24 to 02:23 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:02 to 03:02 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:34 to 03:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:55 to 06:55 | 0.0% |
| Barstow Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:43 | 00:00 | 05:00 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 04:43 | 04:36 -00:26 | 05:00 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 05:52 | 08:53 | 05:24 +00:28 | 09:36 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 03:02 | 14:45 | 03:15 -00:13 | 15:00 -00:15 |
| Running 3 | 06:11 | 17:47 | 05:56 +00:15 | 18:15 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 03:34 | 23:58 | 05:37 -02:03 | 24:11 -00:13 |
| Running 4 | 06:14 | 27:32 | 05:55 +00:19 | 29:48 -02:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:40 | 33:46 | 06:21 +03:19 | 35:43 -01:57 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 43:26 | 06:08 -00:03 | 42:04 +01:22 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 49:31 | 05:03 +00:03 | 48:12 +01:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 54:37 | 05:58 -00:08 | 53:15 +01:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 01:00:27 | 02:26 -00:02 | 59:13 +01:14 |
| Running 7 | 06:06 | 01:02:51 | 05:56 +00:10 | 01:01:39 +01:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:47 | 01:08:57 | 05:54 -00:07 | 01:07:35 +01:22 |
| Running 8 | 08:09 | 01:14:44 | 06:49 +01:20 | 01:13:29 +01:15 |
| Wall Balls | 06:55 | 01:22:53 | 07:42 -00:47 | 01:20:18 +02:35 |
| Roxzone | 06:34 | 01:36:13 | 08:13 -01:39 | 01:36:13 |
Based on his splits analysis, Nathan performed particularly well in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where he was faster than the average time by 23 seconds and 30 seconds respectively. His best running lap was 00:04:43, which was 00:03 faster than the average. However, there were areas for improvement, particularly in the Burpees Broad Jump, Running 2, Running 4, Running 7, Running 3, and Running 8 segments, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on specific areas of improvement, Nathan can enhance his performance in future HYROX races. Regular training, proper nutrition, and rest and recovery are also essential components of a successful training plan.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 이 정우 | 2024 Incheon | 01:36:11 | |
| Bales David | 2023 Birmingham | 01:36:16 | |
| Wong Eric | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:36:19 | |
| Borges González Daniel | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:34 | |
| Stolk Kurt | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:35:47 | |
| Previtero Mirko | 2024 Turin | 01:36:22 | |
| Berger Kai | 2022 Berlin | 01:35:53 | |
| Szwałek Bartłomiej | 2024 Poznan | 01:36:09 | |
| Russell Kieron | 2022 London | 01:36:30 | |
| Markmann Philipp | 2022 Hamburg | 01:36:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
