Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Martin Stephen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Martin Stephen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Martin Stephen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Martin Stephen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:00 | 08:58 to 05:58 | 51.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:24 | 06:19 to 04:55 | 24.1% |
| Run Total | 00:39 | 41:58 to 41:19 | 11.2% |
| Rowing | 00:28 | 05:11 to 04:43 | 8.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 02:18 to 02:01 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:54 to 03:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Martin Stephen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:22 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 04:22 | 04:25 -00:07 | 04:35 -00:13 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 08:40 | 04:55 -00:20 | 09:00 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 13:15 | 02:51 -00:26 | 13:55 -00:40 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 15:40 | 05:21 +00:06 | 16:46 -01:06 |
| Sled Pull | 03:54 | 21:07 | 04:51 -00:57 | 22:07 -01:00 |
| Running 4 | 05:11 | 25:01 | 05:20 -00:09 | 26:58 -01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:19 | 30:12 | 05:14 +01:05 | 32:18 -02:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:56 | 36:31 | 05:30 +00:26 | 37:32 -01:01 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 42:27 | 04:47 +00:24 | 43:02 -00:35 |
| Running 6 | 04:49 | 47:38 | 05:21 -00:32 | 47:49 -00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 52:27 | 02:09 +00:09 | 53:10 -00:43 |
| Running 7 | 04:50 | 54:45 | 05:20 -00:30 | 55:19 -00:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:45 | 59:35 | 05:02 -00:17 | 01:00:39 -01:04 |
| Running 8 | 06:53 | 01:04:20 | 05:56 +00:57 | 01:05:41 -01:21 |
| Wall Balls | 08:58 | 01:11:13 | 06:25 +02:33 | 01:11:37 -00:24 |
| Roxzone | 04:43 | 01:24:45 | 06:43 -02:00 | 01:24:45 |
Stephen Martin performed well in the Hyrox race, finishing in the top 34% of 1,410 athletes overall and in his age group. His overall time of 01:24:45 indicates a strong performance, but there are areas where he can make improvements. His total running time of 00:41:58 was 00:55 slower than average, suggesting that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:04:22 shows potential for strong running abilities.
By implementing these suggestions and tailoring his training to address the specific areas of improvement, Stephen Martin can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. It is important to note that personalized coaching and guidance from a qualified fitness professional can further optimize his training plan.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Den Brink Thom | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:37 | |
| Fletcher Scott | 2022 Wien | 01:24:38 | |
| Baali Brian | 2023 München | 01:24:57 | |
| Maxime Pichard | 2024 Paris | 01:24:41 | |
| Wimberger Andreas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:24:36 | |
| Griffon Tom | 2024 Paris | 01:24:28 | |
| Hettlage Christopher | 2024 Malaga | 01:25:12 | |
| Koenig Steven | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:51 | |
| Manthey Tom | 2021 Berlin | 01:24:54 | |
| Viviani Claudio | 2024 Turin | 01:24:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
