Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 476 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tann Dennis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tann Dennis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tann Dennis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tann Dennis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 12:03 | 01:05:38 to 53:35 | 94.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:46 | 08:35 to 07:49 | 6.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:43 to 06:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:55 to 02:55 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:23 to 08:23 | 0.0% |
| Tann Dennis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:22 | 00:00 | 05:33 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 05:22 | 04:53 -00:22 | 05:33 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 06:50 | 09:53 | 06:21 +00:29 | 10:26 -00:33 |
| Sled Push | 01:57 | 16:43 | 03:55 -01:58 | 16:47 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 07:20 | 18:40 | 07:04 +00:16 | 20:42 -02:02 |
| Sled Pull | 06:43 | 26:00 | 06:51 -00:08 | 27:46 -01:46 |
| Running 4 | 07:49 | 32:43 | 07:08 +00:41 | 34:37 -01:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:35 | 40:32 | 08:05 +00:30 | 41:45 -01:13 |
| Running 5 | 08:01 | 49:07 | 07:26 +00:35 | 49:50 -00:43 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 57:08 | 05:29 -00:19 | 57:16 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 08:06 | 01:02:18 | 07:08 +00:58 | 01:02:45 -00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:55 | 01:10:24 | 02:54 +00:01 | 01:09:53 +00:31 |
| Running 7 | 07:56 | 01:13:19 | 07:10 +00:46 | 01:12:47 +00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:15 | 01:21:15 | 07:32 -02:17 | 01:19:57 +01:18 |
| Running 8 | 14:16 | 01:26:30 | 09:02 +05:14 | 01:27:29 -00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 08:23 | 01:40:46 | 09:53 -01:30 | 01:36:31 +04:15 |
| Roxzone | 07:57 | 01:57:01 | 10:37 -02:40 | 01:57:01 |
Dennis' total running time was 01:05:38, which was 13:28 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to improve his running performance. However, his best running lap was 00:05:22, which was only 00:10 slower than the average, suggesting that he has the potential to improve his running speed.
Overall, Dennis Tann had a solid performance in the HYROX race in Melbourne. To improve his performance, he should focus on improving his running speed and endurance, as well as his upper body and core strength. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his performance in these areas and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennent Ryan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:57:25 | |
| Tavernie Peter | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:57:31 | |
| Layouni Amir | 2022 London | 01:57:26 | |
| Gervais Nicolas | 2023 Paris | 01:56:34 | |
| 常 乐 | 2024 Beijing | 01:57:21 | |
| Kool Marnix | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:57:16 | |
| Ewing Jack | 2024 Manchester | 01:57:13 | |
| Hunt Gary | 2023 Dubai | 01:57:03 | |
| Henao Vida | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:57:28 | |
| Mcgrath Rory | 2023 Dublin | 01:57:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
