Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tann Dennis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tann Dennis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tann Dennis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tann Dennis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:38 | 45:32 to 43:54 | 43.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:59 | 06:31 to 05:32 | 26.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 05:42 to 05:15 | 11.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:24 | 02:36 to 02:12 | 10.6% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:07 to 04:52 | 6.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:31 to 04:29 | 0.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:01 | 05:03 to 05:02 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:46 to 02:46 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:11 to 06:11 | 0.0% |
| Tann Dennis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:44 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 04:44 | 04:31 +00:00 | 04:45 -00:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 09:15 | 05:10 -00:09 | 09:16 -00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 14:16 | 03:04 -00:18 | 14:26 -00:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:29 | 17:02 | 05:38 -00:09 | 17:30 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 22:31 | 05:16 -00:13 | 23:08 -00:37 |
| Running 4 | 05:48 | 27:34 | 05:37 +00:11 | 28:24 -00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:31 | 33:22 | 05:49 +00:42 | 34:01 -00:39 |
| Running 5 | 06:11 | 39:53 | 05:49 +00:22 | 39:50 +00:03 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 46:04 | 04:56 +00:11 | 45:39 +00:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 51:11 | 05:39 +00:10 | 50:35 +00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 57:00 | 02:18 +00:18 | 56:14 +00:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:51 | 59:36 | 05:38 +00:13 | 58:32 +01:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:42 | 01:05:27 | 05:30 +00:12 | 01:04:10 +01:17 |
| Running 8 | 06:42 | 01:11:09 | 06:20 +00:22 | 01:09:40 +01:29 |
| Wall Balls | 06:11 | 01:17:51 | 07:01 -00:50 | 01:16:00 +01:51 |
| Roxzone | 06:39 | 01:30:32 | 07:31 -00:52 | 01:30:32 |
Dennis Tann demonstrated a balanced yet slightly strength-oriented performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race. With an overall time of 01:30:32, he placed in the top 38% overall and the top 39% within his age group. His total running time was 00:45:32, slightly slower by 00:33 compared to the average, suggesting that running may be an area where he can gain more speed. However, his strength in exercises such as the sled push and wall balls indicates a solid foundation in strength-based segments. His pacing suggests he started relatively strong but experienced a gradual slowdown, particularly noticeable from Running 5 onwards, highlighting a need for improved endurance and pacing strategy.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Luesink Daniek | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:30:36 | |
| Cleere Rob | 2023 New York | 01:30:59 | |
| Hall James | 2023 London | 01:30:34 | |
| Aytekin Firat | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:20 | |
| Chaves Paulo | 2023 Stockholm | 01:30:52 | |
| Singh David | 2024 Perth | 01:30:49 | |
| Scully Martin | 2024 Berlin | 01:30:08 | |
| Guttormsen Ryan | 2021 New York | 01:30:25 | |
| Walsh Don | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:30:37 | |
| Yeh Nick | 2023 Chicago | 01:30:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:57:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
