Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mrzygłodzki Grzegorz's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mrzygłodzki Grzegorz's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mrzygłodzki Grzegorz's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mrzygłodzki Grzegorz's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 01:12 | 03:25 to 02:13 | 28.1% |
| Wall Balls | 01:11 | 07:56 to 06:45 | 27.7% |
| Run Total | 00:54 | 45:11 to 44:17 | 21.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:44 | 06:21 to 05:37 | 17.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 05:17 to 05:06 | 4.3% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:57 to 04:53 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:12 to 02:12 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Mrzygłodzki Grzegorz | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:36 | 00:00 | 04:47 +02:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 07:36 | 04:33 -00:07 | 04:47 +02:49 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 12:02 | 05:16 +00:12 | 09:20 +02:42 |
| Sled Push | 02:12 | 17:30 | 03:07 -00:55 | 14:36 +02:54 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 19:42 | 05:45 -00:24 | 17:43 +01:59 |
| Sled Pull | 05:17 | 25:03 | 05:22 -00:05 | 23:28 +01:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 30:20 | 05:44 -00:31 | 28:50 +01:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:21 | 35:33 | 05:56 +00:25 | 34:34 +00:59 |
| Running 5 | 05:25 | 41:54 | 05:56 -00:31 | 40:30 +01:24 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 47:19 | 04:58 -00:01 | 46:26 +00:53 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 52:16 | 05:46 -00:36 | 51:24 +00:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:25 | 57:26 | 02:21 +01:04 | 57:10 +00:16 |
| Running 7 | 05:09 | 01:00:51 | 05:44 -00:35 | 59:31 +01:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:14 | 01:06:00 | 05:32 -00:18 | 01:05:15 +00:45 |
| Running 8 | 05:55 | 01:11:14 | 06:30 -00:35 | 01:10:47 +00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 07:56 | 01:17:09 | 07:11 +00:45 | 01:17:17 -00:08 |
| Roxzone | 07:10 | 01:32:05 | 07:37 -00:27 | 01:32:05 |
Grzegorz Mrzygłodzki, hailing from the 40-44 age group put forth a strong performance in the 2024 Poznan Hyrox race, finishing in the top 63% of his age category. He showcased a promising running profile, with his total running time being 32 seconds faster than the average. Grzegorz took off a bit slower than average in the beginning, however, he managed to pace himself better as the race progressed, with his running splits from running 3 to running 8 consistently faster than the average.
Grzegorz should focus on pacing himself better at the beginning of the race. Starting too slow can result in lost time that is hard to make up for later in the race. He should aim to keep his energy levels and speed consistent throughout the race. Furthermore, focusing on transition speed can eliminate unnecessary time spent in the roxzone. Lastly, incorporating a comprehensive strength and endurance training regimen can help improve his performance in the strength-focused segments of the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Potter Jonathan | 2024 London | 01:32:02 | |
| Jeske Thorsten | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:32:14 | |
| Walstra Durk | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:32:09 | |
| Cachin Mathieu | 2023 München | 01:31:54 | |
| Stavrou Dean | 2024 Perth | 01:31:59 | |
| Aitchison Simon | 2024 London | 01:31:53 | |
| Jones Carl | 2022 London | 01:32:08 | |
| Timmins Steven | 2023 London | 01:32:15 | |
| Valbonesi John | 2024 Glasgow | 01:32:13 | |
| Hall Sam | 2023 London | 01:32:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Katowice | 01:43:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
