Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 362 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kreutzer Etienne's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kreutzer Etienne's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kreutzer Etienne's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kreutzer Etienne's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:24 | 14:16 to 09:52 | 45.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:59 | 10:26 to 07:27 | 30.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 05:07 to 03:01 | 21.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 05:05 to 04:57 | 1.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:02 | 07:04 to 07:02 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:43 to 07:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 54:41 to 54:41 | 0.0% |
| Kreutzer Etienne | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:50 | 00:00 | 05:43 -01:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:05 | 03:50 | 04:54 +00:11 | 05:43 -01:53 |
| Running 2 | 05:58 | 08:55 | 06:23 -00:25 | 10:37 -01:42 |
| Sled Push | 03:44 | 14:53 | 04:02 -00:18 | 17:00 -02:07 |
| Running 3 | 06:14 | 18:37 | 07:13 -00:59 | 21:02 -02:25 |
| Sled Pull | 07:04 | 24:51 | 07:07 -00:03 | 28:15 -03:24 |
| Running 4 | 06:30 | 31:55 | 07:14 -00:44 | 35:22 -03:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:43 | 38:25 | 08:25 -00:42 | 42:36 -04:11 |
| Running 5 | 07:05 | 46:08 | 07:36 -00:31 | 51:01 -04:53 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 53:13 | 05:32 -00:12 | 58:37 -05:24 |
| Running 6 | 06:57 | 58:33 | 07:21 -00:24 | 01:04:09 -05:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 05:07 | 01:05:30 | 02:57 +02:10 | 01:11:30 -06:00 |
| Running 7 | 08:06 | 01:10:37 | 07:19 +00:47 | 01:14:27 -03:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 10:26 | 01:18:43 | 07:50 +02:36 | 01:21:46 -03:03 |
| Running 8 | 10:05 | 01:29:09 | 09:22 +00:43 | 01:29:36 -00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 14:16 | 01:39:14 | 10:16 +04:00 | 01:38:58 +00:16 |
| Roxzone | 07:16 | 02:00:36 | 11:22 -04:06 | 02:00:36 |
Etienne Kreutzer demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing with an overall time of 02:00:36. His total running time was particularly impressive at 00:54:41, which is 03:58 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Etienne's pacing strategy suggests a fast start, as evidenced by his significant lead in the Running 1 segment, but he may have experienced fatigue towards the latter stages, as seen in the slower times in the final running segments. This suggests an opportunity to balance his pacing more effectively throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vigfusson Bjorgvin | 2024 Manchester | 02:00:20 | |
| Nykamp Clint | 2023 Birmingham | 02:00:19 | |
| Köster Jonas | 2019 Hamburg | 02:00:14 | |
| Caddy Jason | 2023 Melbourne | 02:00:35 | |
| Colton Tom | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:00:53 | |
| Coia Paul | 2023 Melbourne | 02:00:13 | |
| Koesuma Ryan | 2024 Hong Kong | 02:01:01 | |
| Macavoy Paul | 2024 London | 02:00:37 | |
| Demetriou Demetri | 2024 Cape Town | 02:00:17 | |
| Kharchi Thomas | 2024 Paris | 02:00:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
