Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:34 (From 45:45 to 43:11) | 62.9% |
| BBJ | 00:27 (From 05:45 to 05:18) | 11.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:27 (From 04:33 to 04:06) | 11.0% |
| Rowing | 00:20 (From 05:30 to 05:10) | 8.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 (From 05:12 to 04:55) | 6.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:07 to 02:07) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:35 to 04:35) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:53 to 01:53) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:11 to 04:11) | 0.0% |
| Zywiolek Ewa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:34 | 00:00 | 04:58 +01:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:12 | 06:34 | 05:02 +00:10 | 04:58 +01:36 |
| Running 2 | 05:24 | 11:46 | 05:18 +00:06 | 10:00 +01:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:07 | 17:10 | 02:36 -00:29 | 15:18 +01:52 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 19:17 | 05:35 -00:02 | 17:54 +01:23 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 24:50 | 05:25 -00:50 | 23:29 +01:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:46 | 29:25 | 05:36 +00:10 | 28:54 +00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:45 | 35:11 | 05:44 +00:01 | 34:30 +00:41 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 40:56 | 05:44 -00:10 | 40:14 +00:42 |
| Rowing | 05:30 | 46:30 | 05:17 +00:13 | 45:58 +00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 52:00 | 05:38 -00:13 | 51:15 +00:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 57:25 | 02:10 -00:17 | 56:53 +00:32 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 59:18 | 05:37 -00:15 | 59:03 +00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:11 | 01:04:40 | 04:31 -00:20 | 01:04:40 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 06:12 | 01:08:51 | 06:00 +00:12 | 01:09:11 -00:20 |
| Wall Balls | 04:33 | 01:15:03 | 04:43 -00:10 | 01:15:11 -00:08 |
| Roxzone | 06:57 | 01:26:25 | 06:31 +00:26 | 01:26:25 |
Ewa Zywiolek performed exceptionally in the HYROX race, ranking in the top 8% of all athletes and the top 9% in her age group. Her overall time was impressive at 01:26:25. Ewa's strength appears to lie in her strength-based exercises, with fast times in the sled push, sled pull, farmers carry, and sandbag lunges. In contrast, her total running time was slower than average, suggesting that she may benefit from additional running training.
Her pacing in the earlier stages of the race was slower than the average, particularly in running 1, which was 01:33 slower than average. However, despite starting slower, she seemed to maintain a steady pace and even managed to pick up her speed in the later stages, as evidenced by her faster than average times in running 5, 6, and 7. This suggests a hybrid profile, with a strong performance in strength-based exercises and an ability to maintain a steady running pace.
Moving forward, Ewa could benefit from implementing a few key race strategies. First, although her slower start did not significantly impact her overall performance, she might find it beneficial to start at a slightly faster pace. This could help to reduce her total running time and potentially improve her overall time.
Second, focusing on her transition speed during the race could also help to shave off valuable seconds from her Roxzone time. This could involve strategizing the most efficient ways to move between exercises and practicing these during training.
Finally, given her strength in strength-based exercises, Ewa could consider conserving her energy during the running segments to maximize her performance in these exercises. This could involve maintaining a steady, but not overly fast, running pace and focusing on her form during the strength-based exercises to ensure maximum efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van De Bilt Sharon | 2024 Maastricht | 01:26:05 | |
| Messerly Louise | 2024 Nice | 01:26:00 | |
| Gardner Hannah | 2023 Birmingham | 01:26:31 | |
| Molina Pucheta Sol | 2024 Sydney | 01:26:33 | |
| Nießen Nora | 2021 Hamburg | 01:26:33 | |
| Gee Mellissa | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:59 | |
| Linford Amy | 2023 London | 01:26:42 | |
| Allen Radka | 2024 Malaga | 01:26:06 | |
| Gatzsche Damaris | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:52 | |
| Ferronato Ally | 2021 Birmingham | 01:26:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Frankfurt Zywiolek Ewa | 01:35:20 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam Zywiolek Ewa | 01:56:21 | |
| 2024 Köln Zywiolek Ewa | 01:33:31 | |
| 2024 Rimini Zywiolek Ewa | 01:32:11 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam Zywiolek Ewa, Sztybrych Malgorzata | 01:17:07 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt Zywiolek Ewa, Sztybrych Malgorzata | 01:15:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Zywiolek Ewa
