Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire O'Hanlon Peter's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights O'Hanlon Peter's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the O'Hanlon Peter's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve O'Hanlon Peter's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:40 | 07:28 to 04:48 | 47.1% |
| Run Total | 02:10 | 42:59 to 40:49 | 38.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:30 | 06:20 to 05:50 | 8.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 05:00 to 04:40 | 5.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:34 to 01:34 | 0.0% |
| O'Hanlon Peter | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 04:33 -00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 03:46 | 04:24 -00:08 | 04:33 -00:47 |
| Running 2 | 05:40 | 08:02 | 04:52 +00:48 | 08:57 -00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 13:42 | 02:52 -00:37 | 13:49 -00:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 15:57 | 05:18 +00:14 | 16:41 -00:44 |
| Sled Pull | 03:31 | 21:29 | 04:49 -01:18 | 21:59 -00:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 25:00 | 05:16 +00:18 | 26:48 -01:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:28 | 30:34 | 05:07 +02:21 | 32:04 -01:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 38:02 | 05:26 +00:06 | 37:11 +00:51 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 43:34 | 04:46 -00:12 | 42:37 +00:57 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 48:08 | 05:18 +00:21 | 47:23 +00:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:34 | 53:47 | 02:08 -00:34 | 52:41 +01:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 55:21 | 05:17 +00:03 | 54:49 +00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:00 | 01:00:41 | 04:57 +00:03 | 01:00:06 +00:35 |
| Running 8 | 06:00 | 01:05:41 | 05:51 +00:09 | 01:05:03 +00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 06:20 | 01:11:41 | 06:16 +00:04 | 01:10:54 +00:47 |
| Roxzone | 05:55 | 01:23:47 | 06:37 -00:42 | 01:23:47 |
Peter O'Hanlon delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking within the top 30% overall and within his age group. His strengths were evident in the strength-based exercises, notably with exceptional times in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry. However, Peter's total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting a need to focus more on his running capabilities. His initial run was notably fast, indicating he might have started the race at a slightly aggressive pace. This, combined with a slower overall running time, suggests a need to balance his pacing throughout the event.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Belli Thomas | 2024 Maastricht | 01:24:02 | |
| Gtzelmann Marcus | 2023 Köln | 01:23:54 | |
| Matics Nick | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:23:43 | |
| Frias Amaral Nelson | 2023 Madrid | 01:23:25 | |
| ORourke Dan | 2024 Brisbane | 01:23:59 | |
| Contessi Stefano | 2024 Turin | 01:23:55 | |
| Goodson Paul | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:23:40 | |
| Dhjan Frederic | 2024 Marseille | 01:24:02 | |
| Ennis Jeff | 2024 Dublin | 01:24:16 | |
| Stoltenborg Michael | 2024 Malaga | 01:23:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
