Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Segrave Kim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Segrave Kim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Segrave Kim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Segrave Kim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:14 | 05:10 to 03:56 | 48.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:42 | 05:49 to 05:07 | 27.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 | 02:39 to 02:19 | 13.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 04:27 to 04:09 | 11.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:57 to 41:57 | 0.0% |
| Segrave Kim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:33 | 00:00 | 04:52 +00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 05:33 | 05:00 -00:27 | 04:52 +00:41 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 10:06 | 05:15 -00:18 | 09:52 +00:14 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 15:03 | 02:35 +00:04 | 15:07 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 17:42 | 05:30 -00:25 | 17:42 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:18 | 22:47 | 05:20 -01:02 | 23:12 -00:25 |
| Running 4 | 05:07 | 27:05 | 05:31 -00:24 | 28:32 -01:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:49 | 32:12 | 05:34 +00:15 | 34:03 -01:51 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 38:01 | 05:39 -00:28 | 39:37 -01:36 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 43:12 | 05:14 -00:20 | 45:16 -02:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:13 | 48:06 | 05:33 -00:20 | 50:30 -02:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 53:19 | 02:09 -00:23 | 56:03 -02:44 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 55:05 | 05:31 -00:12 | 58:12 -03:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:27 | 01:00:24 | 04:25 +00:02 | 01:03:43 -03:19 |
| Running 8 | 05:35 | 01:04:51 | 05:52 -00:17 | 01:08:08 -03:17 |
| Wall Balls | 05:10 | 01:10:26 | 04:27 +00:43 | 01:14:00 -03:34 |
| Roxzone | 09:14 | 01:24:42 | 06:15 +02:59 | 01:24:42 |
Kim Segrave demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox race, finishing with an overall rank of 79 out of 688 athletes, placing her in the top 11%. Within her age group (45-49), she finished 9th, which is in the top 17% of 52 athletes. Her total time was 01:24:42, with a notably strong running performance, clocking a total running time of 00:41:57, which is 02:20 faster than the average. This suggests that Kim has a strong runner profile. However, the detailed analysis of the running segments indicates she started her race relatively slow, as seen in Running 1, but picked up pace significantly in subsequent laps. This hints at a conservative start, followed by a strong, consistent running performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cantrell Haley | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:24:19 | |
| Knaack Silja | 2023 Hamburg | 01:25:11 | |
| Stoner Caitlin | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:24:15 | |
| Monroy Espejo Guadalupe | 2023 Valencia | 01:24:13 | |
| Mcardell Lois | 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:07 | |
| Robbins Caitlin | 2023 London | 01:24:56 | |
| Hirst Athina | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:24:13 | |
| Hagelauer Emily | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:25:11 | |
| Elter Kim | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:18 | |
| Quigg Caoimhe | 2024 Dublin | 01:24:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
