Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lenyk Zygmunt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lenyk Zygmunt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lenyk Zygmunt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lenyk Zygmunt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:17 | 07:07 to 05:50 | 27.8% |
| Sled Push | 01:08 | 03:45 to 02:37 | 24.5% |
| Sled Pull | 01:04 | 05:33 to 04:29 | 23.1% |
| Rowing | 00:26 | 05:07 to 04:41 | 9.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 05:09 to 04:48 | 7.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:36 to 04:20 | 5.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:04 to 01:59 | 1.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:28 to 39:28 | 0.0% |
| Lenyk Zygmunt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:36 | 00:00 | 04:32 +01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 05:36 | 04:24 +00:12 | 04:32 +01:04 |
| Running 2 | 04:28 | 10:12 | 04:52 -00:24 | 08:56 +01:16 |
| Sled Push | 03:45 | 14:40 | 02:51 +00:54 | 13:48 +00:52 |
| Running 3 | 04:51 | 18:25 | 05:18 -00:27 | 16:39 +01:46 |
| Sled Pull | 05:33 | 23:16 | 04:48 +00:45 | 21:57 +01:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:07 | 28:49 | 05:15 -00:08 | 26:45 +02:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:09 | 33:56 | 05:07 +00:02 | 32:00 +01:56 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 39:05 | 05:26 -00:05 | 37:07 +01:58 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 44:26 | 04:46 +00:21 | 42:33 +01:53 |
| Running 6 | 04:52 | 49:33 | 05:18 -00:26 | 47:19 +02:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 54:25 | 02:08 -00:04 | 52:37 +01:48 |
| Running 7 | 04:54 | 56:29 | 05:17 -00:23 | 54:45 +01:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:38 | 01:01:23 | 04:57 -00:19 | 01:00:02 +01:21 |
| Running 8 | 04:23 | 01:06:01 | 05:51 -01:28 | 01:04:59 +01:02 |
| Wall Balls | 07:07 | 01:10:24 | 06:16 +00:51 | 01:10:50 -00:26 |
| Roxzone | 06:19 | 01:23:42 | 06:36 -00:17 | 01:23:42 |
Zygmunt Lenyk delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race, securing an overall rank in the top 33% and a rank within the top 40% of his age group. His overall time was 01:23:42, with a notably strong total running time of 00:39:28, which was 02:44 faster than the average. This indicates a solid running proficiency. However, Zygmunt's early running segments suggest a slightly slow start, which he compensated for in the later stages of the race. His performance reflects a hybrid athlete profile, with strengths in running but room for improvement in strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Graveleine Marc | 2024 Turin | 01:23:42 | |
| Pons Quetglas Llorenç | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:08 | |
| Quinn Stephen | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:30 | |
| Donnelly Richard | 2023 London | 01:23:26 | |
| Pennacchio Umberto | 2024 Milan | 01:24:10 | |
| Bühlmann Sem | 2023 München | 01:23:48 | |
| Hartmann Jakob | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:24:05 | |
| Hendriks Koen | 2024 Maastricht | 01:23:42 | |
| Hollis Chris | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:23:40 | |
| Matthams Joe | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:18:30 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
