Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:51 (From 48:50 to 46:59) | 56.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:50 (From 04:07 to 03:17) | 25.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:33 (From 06:09 to 05:36) | 16.8% |
| Rowing | 00:01 (From 05:04 to 05:03) | 0.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:01 (From 07:33 to 07:32) | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:38 to 04:38) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 06:10 to 06:10) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:09 to 02:09) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 05:18 to 05:18) | 0.0% |
| Zinke Eric | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 05:04 -00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 04:51 | 04:38 +00:00 | 05:04 -00:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 09:29 | 05:30 +00:13 | 09:42 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 04:07 | 15:12 | 03:18 +00:49 | 15:12 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 19:19 | 06:02 +00:10 | 18:30 +00:49 |
| Sled Pull | 06:09 | 25:31 | 05:45 +00:24 | 24:32 +00:59 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 31:40 | 06:02 +00:14 | 30:17 +01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:10 | 37:56 | 06:31 -00:21 | 36:19 +01:37 |
| Running 5 | 06:16 | 44:06 | 06:16 +00:00 | 42:50 +01:16 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 50:22 | 05:06 -00:02 | 49:06 +01:16 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 55:26 | 06:05 -00:02 | 54:12 +01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 01:01:29 | 02:29 -00:20 | 01:00:17 +01:12 |
| Running 7 | 06:13 | 01:03:38 | 06:03 +00:10 | 01:02:46 +00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:18 | 01:09:51 | 06:07 -00:49 | 01:08:49 +01:02 |
| Running 8 | 07:19 | 01:15:09 | 07:02 +00:17 | 01:14:56 +00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 07:33 | 01:22:28 | 07:50 -00:17 | 01:21:58 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 08:23 | 01:38:17 | 08:29 -00:06 | 01:38:17 |
Based on the splits analysis, Eric's running performance was slightly slower than average, with running segments 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7 being the areas where he lost the most time. His pacing throughout the race was consistent, although slightly slower than average. He has a balanced profile, with no significant preference for either running or strength-based exercises.
In conclusion, Eric Zinke performed well in the HYROX race in Munich, with areas of strength in his overall rank and balanced performance in both running and strength-based exercises. To improve his performance, Eric should focus on increasing his running speed and endurance, as well as working on his sled push technique and lower body strength. Implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation will also contribute to his overall performance improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceniceros Martínez Mauricio | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:38:08 | |
| Proctor Mark | 2024 Singapore | 01:38:00 | |
| Pegoretti Michele | 2024 Rimini | 01:37:57 | |
| Guilbert Maxence | 2023 Paris | 01:38:24 | |
| Woudwijk Michel | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:38:42 | |
| Franz Philipp | 2024 Köln | 01:37:49 | |
| Driskell Joseph | 2024 Bilbao | 01:38:27 | |
| Bueno Emmanuel | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:38:17 | |
| Sommer Elias Nico | 2018 Hamburg | 01:37:50 | |
| Stoner Jeff | 2023 Dallas | 01:38:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Zinke Eric
