Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Visser Rutger's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Visser Rutger's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Visser Rutger's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Visser Rutger's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
06:02.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Rutger Visser delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 17% overall and top 19% within his age group. This indicates a strong competitive edge among his peers. Notably, Rutger's running performance was slightly slower than average, with a total running time of 40:56, which suggests that there may be room for improvement in his running capabilities. However, his impressive execution in segments like the Sled Pull and Wall Balls highlights his strength and endurance. Analyzing the initial running segments, it seems Rutger started too fast, particularly evident in Running 1, where he was significantly faster than average, which may have contributed to fatigue in later stages.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time: Rutger's total running time was 1:37 slower than average. To enhance running performance, incorporate interval training and tempo runs in his routine. Intervals (e.g., 400m repeats at a fast pace with short recovery) can improve speed and endurance, while tempo runs help increase lactate threshold, allowing for sustained faster paces.
Sandbag Lunges: This segment was 56 seconds slower than average. Focus on lower body strength and form. Implement weighted lunges, single-leg deadlifts, and step-ups to build strength. Practicing lunges with proper form and gradually increasing weight can enhance performance.
Burpees Broad Jump: Rutger was 12 seconds slower than average. Improve explosive power and efficiency through plyometric exercises like box jumps and burpee variations. Emphasize maintaining a steady rhythm and minimizing transition time between movements.
Sled Push: While slower by 7 seconds, this segment can be improved by focusing on pushing strength and technique. Incorporate sled push/pull drills and leg press exercises to build power and efficiency in this movement.
Rowing: 14 seconds slower than average indicates potential for improvement. Focus on technique and endurance with rowing intervals and steady-state rowing sessions. Prioritize efficient stroke mechanics to maximize power output.
Race Strategies
Start at a Sustainable Pace: Avoid starting too fast to conserve energy for later segments. Aim for a consistent pace across all running segments to prevent fatigue.
Efficient Transitions: Work on reducing transition times between stations, especially in the Roxzone. Practice moving swiftly between exercises to maintain momentum.
Focus on Form: Maintaining proper form during exercises like lunges and burpees will prevent energy wastage and reduce the risk of injury.
Compromised Running Drills: Include running drills post high-intensity exercises to simulate race conditions and improve performance under fatigue.