Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Los Angeles using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Vásquez Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Vásquez Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Vásquez Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Vásquez Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:17 | 53:09 to 45:52 | 82.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:35 | 02:55 to 02:20 | 6.6% |
| Rowing | 00:28 | 05:27 to 04:59 | 5.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 05:48 to 05:23 | 4.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 03:14 to 03:09 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Vásquez Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:14 | 00:00 | 04:58 +01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 06:14 | 04:36 -00:04 | 04:58 +01:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:39 | 10:46 | 05:23 +00:16 | 09:34 +01:12 |
| Sled Push | 03:14 | 16:25 | 03:13 +00:01 | 14:57 +01:28 |
| Running 3 | 07:25 | 19:39 | 05:51 +01:34 | 18:10 +01:29 |
| Sled Pull | 05:48 | 27:04 | 05:33 +00:15 | 24:01 +03:03 |
| Running 4 | 06:47 | 32:52 | 05:52 +00:55 | 29:34 +03:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:44 | 39:39 | 06:18 -01:34 | 35:26 +04:13 |
| Running 5 | 06:13 | 44:23 | 06:06 +00:07 | 41:44 +02:39 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 50:36 | 05:03 +00:24 | 47:50 +02:46 |
| Running 6 | 06:14 | 56:03 | 05:55 +00:19 | 52:53 +03:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:55 | 01:02:17 | 02:27 +00:28 | 58:48 +03:29 |
| Running 7 | 06:22 | 01:05:12 | 05:54 +00:28 | 01:01:15 +03:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:43 | 01:11:34 | 05:53 -02:10 | 01:07:09 +04:25 |
| Running 8 | 08:19 | 01:15:17 | 06:49 +01:30 | 01:13:02 +02:15 |
| Wall Balls | 05:22 | 01:23:36 | 07:37 -02:15 | 01:19:51 +03:45 |
| Roxzone | 06:46 | 01:35:35 | 08:07 -01:21 | 01:35:35 |
Nathan's total running time of 00:53:09 is 07:54 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time in order to reduce the time spent in the ROXzone. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:39 shows that he has the potential to improve his running speed.
In conclusion, Nathan Vásquez had a solid performance in the HYROX race in Los Angeles. By focusing on improving his running endurance, speed, and form, as well as optimizing his transition time, Nathan can enhance his overall performance in future races. Implementing specific training strategies and techniques, as well as following race strategies for pacing and mental preparation, will help him achieve his goals.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Piller Patrick | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:35:24 | |
| Brugues Joel | 2023 Stockholm | 01:35:56 | |
| Niermann Sebastian | 2023 Hannover | 01:35:39 | |
| Mach Reik | 2019 Hannover | 01:35:48 | |
| Duverger Maël | 2024 Marseille | 01:35:29 | |
| Roberts Joe | 2023 Dallas | 01:35:06 | |
| Tay Jeffrey | 2023 Melbourne | 01:35:55 | |
| Sandhu Suki | 2024 Berlin | 01:35:45 | |
| Martin Ganduz Ivan | 2021 Madrid | 01:35:55 | |
| Weidner Marvin | 2023 Hannover | 01:35:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Dallas | 01:55:26 | |
| 2023 Los Angeles | 01:45:56 | |
| 2023 Chicago | 01:45:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
