Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Hannover using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mach Reik's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mach Reik's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mach Reik's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mach Reik's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:51 | 50:56 to 46:05 | 76.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:58 | 06:38 to 05:40 | 15.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 07:38 to 07:16 | 5.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:30 to 02:22 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Mach Reik | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:28 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 05:28 | 04:36 -00:12 | 04:58 +00:30 |
| Running 2 | 06:00 | 09:52 | 05:23 +00:37 | 09:34 +00:18 |
| Sled Push | 02:04 | 15:52 | 03:13 -01:09 | 14:57 +00:55 |
| Running 3 | 06:18 | 17:56 | 05:52 +00:26 | 18:10 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 24:14 | 05:36 -01:03 | 24:02 +00:12 |
| Running 4 | 06:19 | 28:47 | 05:53 +00:26 | 29:38 -00:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:25 | 35:06 | 06:19 -01:54 | 35:31 -00:25 |
| Running 5 | 06:28 | 39:31 | 06:07 +00:21 | 41:50 -02:19 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 45:59 | 05:03 -00:09 | 47:57 -01:58 |
| Running 6 | 06:39 | 50:53 | 05:55 +00:44 | 53:00 -02:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 57:32 | 02:27 +00:03 | 58:55 -01:23 |
| Running 7 | 06:51 | 01:00:02 | 05:54 +00:57 | 01:01:22 -01:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:38 | 01:06:53 | 05:54 +00:44 | 01:07:16 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 06:57 | 01:13:31 | 06:48 +00:09 | 01:13:10 +00:21 |
| Wall Balls | 07:38 | 01:20:28 | 07:41 -00:03 | 01:19:58 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 07:51 | 01:35:48 | 08:09 -00:18 | 01:35:48 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Reik Mach struggled in several running segments, particularly Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, and Running 5. These segments accounted for a significant amount of time lost during the race. Additionally, Sandbag Lunges, Running 6, and Running 7 also contributed to time loss.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Reik Mach can enhance his performance in future HYROX races and achieve better results. It is important to tailor the training strategies and techniques to his age group, nationality, and individual strengths and weaknesses. Regular assessment of progress and adjustments to the training plan will also be crucial for continued improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bruma Prince | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:35:46 | |
| Szczuka Pawel | 2024 Poznan | 01:35:30 | |
| Harris Nathan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:36:09 | |
| Vaessen Robert | 2024 Maastricht | 01:35:57 | |
| Vitrotti Tommaso | 2024 Turin | 01:35:50 | |
| Kopp Christian | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:35:24 | |
| Butron Rua Pablo | 2023 Barcelona | 01:35:26 | |
| Duncan Henry | 2023 Dublin | 01:35:46 | |
| Pacheco Eduardo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:36:16 | |
| Dong Wen | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2018 Hamburg | 01:33:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
