Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mctaggart Harry's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mctaggart Harry's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mctaggart Harry's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mctaggart Harry's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:02 | 47:29 to 45:27 | 43.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:56 | 06:50 to 05:54 | 19.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:41 | 03:00 to 02:19 | 14.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 03:32 to 03:07 | 8.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:49 to 04:34 | 5.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 05:30 to 05:19 | 3.9% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:08 to 04:57 | 3.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:55 to 05:55 | 0.0% |
| Mctaggart Harry | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:07 | 00:00 | 04:55 +00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 05:07 | 04:34 +00:15 | 04:55 +00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 09:56 | 05:21 -00:09 | 09:29 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 03:32 | 15:08 | 03:12 +00:20 | 14:50 +00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 18:40 | 05:52 -00:28 | 18:02 +00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 05:30 | 24:04 | 05:30 +00:00 | 23:54 +00:10 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 29:34 | 05:51 -00:12 | 29:24 +00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:50 | 35:13 | 06:08 +00:42 | 35:15 -00:02 |
| Running 5 | 06:21 | 42:03 | 06:03 +00:18 | 41:23 +00:40 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 48:24 | 05:00 +00:08 | 47:26 +00:58 |
| Running 6 | 06:05 | 53:32 | 05:52 +00:13 | 52:26 +01:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:00 | 59:37 | 02:24 +00:36 | 58:18 +01:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:52 | 01:02:37 | 05:52 +00:00 | 01:00:42 +01:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:07 | 01:08:29 | 05:44 -01:37 | 01:06:34 +01:55 |
| Running 8 | 07:52 | 01:12:36 | 06:41 +01:11 | 01:12:18 +00:18 |
| Wall Balls | 05:55 | 01:20:28 | 07:25 -01:30 | 01:18:59 +01:29 |
| Roxzone | 08:02 | 01:34:19 | 07:55 +00:07 | 01:34:19 |
In terms of his splits, it is notable that Harry's total running time of 00:47:29 was 03:08 slower than the average. This suggests that he may benefit from improving his overall fitness and his transition time between exercises. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:07 indicates that he has the potential to excel in running, but there is room for improvement.
In conclusion, Harry Mctaggart showed a solid performance in the HYROX race in Glasgow. By focusing on improving his overall fitness and specific areas of weakness identified in the race splits, he can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races. Incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to target these areas will help him reach his full potential as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper Alex | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:34:33 | |
| Ives Andrew | 2023 Melbourne | 01:33:55 | |
| Mohrmann Jörg | 2024 Hamburg | 01:34:06 | |
| Woelki Dustin | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:34:28 | |
| Van Der Loop Michel | 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:04 | |
| Oldewurtel Sven | 2024 Hamburg | 01:33:53 | |
| Muruato Illan Dante | 2024 Marseille | 01:34:10 | |
| Hirschel Michael | 2018 Leipzig | 01:34:06 | |
| Becker Stefan | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:34:11 | |
| De Koning Stef | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:33:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
