Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 790 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clerici Mauro's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clerici Mauro's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clerici Mauro's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clerici Mauro's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 03:30 | 07:15 to 03:45 | 36.8% |
| Sled Pull | 03:18 | 09:41 to 06:23 | 34.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:01 | 07:43 to 06:42 | 10.7% |
| Rowing | 00:43 | 06:00 to 05:17 | 7.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:27 | 03:13 to 02:46 | 4.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:25 | 09:13 to 08:48 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:56 to 04:49 | 1.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 48:45 to 48:45 | 0.0% |
| Clerici Mauro | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:46 | 00:00 | 05:24 +00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 05:46 | 04:47 +00:09 | 05:24 +00:22 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 10:42 | 05:57 -00:41 | 10:11 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 07:15 | 15:58 | 03:44 +03:31 | 16:08 -00:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:04 | 23:13 | 06:36 -00:32 | 19:52 +03:21 |
| Sled Pull | 09:41 | 29:17 | 06:27 +03:14 | 26:28 +02:49 |
| Running 4 | 06:09 | 38:58 | 06:36 -00:27 | 32:55 +06:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:56 | 45:07 | 07:28 -02:32 | 39:31 +05:36 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 50:03 | 06:57 -00:23 | 46:59 +03:04 |
| Rowing | 06:00 | 56:37 | 05:19 +00:41 | 53:56 +02:41 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 01:02:37 | 06:42 -00:41 | 59:15 +03:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:13 | 01:08:38 | 02:46 +00:27 | 01:05:57 +02:41 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 01:11:51 | 06:45 -00:47 | 01:08:43 +03:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:43 | 01:17:49 | 07:01 +00:42 | 01:15:28 +02:21 |
| Running 8 | 07:01 | 01:25:32 | 08:11 -01:10 | 01:22:29 +03:03 |
| Wall Balls | 09:13 | 01:32:33 | 09:06 +00:07 | 01:30:40 +01:53 |
| Roxzone | 07:57 | 01:49:36 | 09:50 -01:53 | 01:49:36 |
Clerici's best running lap was completed in 00:05:16, showcasing his ability to maintain a fast pace during a single lap.
Best Lap Analysis:
Clerici's best running lap time was 00:05:16, indicating his ability to maintain a fast pace. This highlights his strength in maintaining speed and endurance during a single lap.
Overall, Clerici should continue to work on improving his overall fitness and strength, with a specific focus on the identified areas of improvement. By incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to enhance performance in these particular areas, he can further improve his race performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sander Patrick | 2019 Leipzig | 01:49:49 | |
| Kua Andre | 2024 Singapore | 01:49:16 | |
| Mielnicki Sebastian | 2024 Gdansk | 01:49:53 | |
| Lok Zhenghui | 2023 Singapore | 01:49:07 | |
| Garym Williams | 2024 Birmingham | 01:49:53 | |
| Yannick Roubinet | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:49:53 | |
| Noll Daniel | 2018 Wien | 01:49:21 | |
| Dempc Łukasz | 2024 Gdansk | 01:49:46 | |
| Mitchell Neil | 2024 Birmingham | 01:49:15 | |
| Atza Simone | 2024 Milan | 01:50:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
