Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 194 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chevet Fanny's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chevet Fanny's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chevet Fanny's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chevet Fanny's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:22 | 44:41 to 42:19 | 70.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 07:11 to 06:23 | 23.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:12 | 06:32 to 06:20 | 5.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:34 to 03:34 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:38 to 03:38 | 0.0% |
| Chevet Fanny | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:17 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 04:17 | 04:50 -00:14 | 04:47 -00:30 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 08:53 | 05:08 -00:16 | 09:37 -00:44 |
| Sled Push | 03:34 | 13:45 | 04:02 -00:28 | 14:45 -01:00 |
| Running 3 | 08:33 | 17:19 | 05:30 +03:03 | 18:47 -01:28 |
| Sled Pull | 07:11 | 25:52 | 06:37 +00:34 | 24:17 +01:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 33:03 | 05:32 -00:11 | 30:54 +02:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:42 | 38:24 | 05:13 -00:31 | 36:26 +01:58 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 43:06 | 05:39 -00:15 | 41:39 +01:27 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 48:30 | 05:06 -00:19 | 47:18 +01:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 53:17 | 05:34 -00:14 | 52:24 +00:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 58:37 | 02:43 -00:15 | 57:58 +00:39 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 01:01:05 | 05:35 -00:22 | 01:00:41 +00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:38 | 01:06:18 | 05:18 -01:40 | 01:06:16 +00:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:45 | 01:09:56 | 06:00 -00:15 | 01:11:34 -01:38 |
| Wall Balls | 06:32 | 01:15:41 | 06:26 +00:06 | 01:17:34 -01:53 |
| Roxzone | 08:15 | 01:30:20 | 06:20 +01:55 | 01:30:20 |
Fanny Chevet demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Paris HYROX PRO event, ranking in the top 18% of all athletes and in the top 24% of her age group. Her overall time was 01:30:20. The total running time was 00:44:41, which is 00:58 slower than the average. This suggests that Fanny may have a more strength-oriented profile and should focus on improving her running skills. Notably, the first four running segments were completed faster than the average, indicating a strong start but also hinting at possible pacing issues.
In future races, Fanny should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brown Emily | 2023 Manchester | 01:30:37 | |
| Crawford Brittany | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:30:09 | |
| Hammond Krista | 2024 Madrid | 01:30:36 | |
| Ion Amy | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:39 | |
| Gauthier Clara | 2024 Marseille | 01:30:41 | |
| Nel Roxanne | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:30:21 | |
| Houben Nathalie | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:30:30 | |
| Ritchens Sally | 2023 Melbourne | 01:30:01 | |
| Arzberger Melanie | 2024 Milan | 01:30:14 | |
| Mccurley Emmason | 2024 Brisbane | 01:30:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
