Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Caseley Phil's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Caseley Phil's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Caseley Phil's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Caseley Phil's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:03 | 05:43 to 04:40 | 22.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:58 | 06:00 to 05:02 | 21.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:56 | 07:02 to 06:06 | 20.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:38 | 05:30 to 04:52 | 13.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 03:16 to 02:43 | 12.0% |
| Rowing | 00:28 | 05:12 to 04:44 | 10.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:23 to 39:23 | 0.0% |
| Caseley Phil | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:06 | 00:00 | 04:38 +00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 05:06 | 04:27 -00:08 | 04:38 +00:28 |
| Running 2 | 04:34 | 09:25 | 04:59 -00:25 | 09:05 +00:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:16 | 13:59 | 02:56 +00:20 | 14:04 -00:05 |
| Running 3 | 04:50 | 17:15 | 05:25 -00:35 | 17:00 +00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 05:43 | 22:05 | 04:59 +00:44 | 22:25 -00:20 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 27:48 | 05:25 -00:35 | 27:24 +00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:00 | 32:38 | 05:20 +00:40 | 32:49 -00:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:00 | 38:38 | 05:35 -00:35 | 38:09 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 43:38 | 04:49 +00:23 | 43:44 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 04:46 | 48:50 | 05:28 -00:42 | 48:33 +00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 53:36 | 02:12 -00:27 | 54:01 -00:25 |
| Running 7 | 05:00 | 55:21 | 05:25 -00:25 | 56:13 -00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:30 | 01:00:21 | 05:07 +00:23 | 01:01:38 -01:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:20 | 01:05:51 | 06:03 -00:43 | 01:06:45 -00:54 |
| Wall Balls | 07:02 | 01:11:11 | 06:33 +00:29 | 01:12:48 -01:37 |
| Roxzone | 08:12 | 01:26:17 | 06:56 +01:16 | 01:26:17 |
Phil Caseley performed admirably in the 2024 Birmingham event, finishing in the top 34% overall and the top 40% in his age group. His performance was particularly strong in the running segments, as evidenced by his total running time being faster than average by 03:52. This suggests that Caseley is more of a runner profile athlete, with notable speed and endurance. However, his pacing needs adjustment. He started slower than average in his first running segment and was struggling in the roxzone which indicates he might have pushed too hard in the beginning.
Caseley should consider a more strategic pacing approach for the race. As a runner profile athlete, he should conserve some energy in the initial running segments to better handle the strength segments and transitions. Focusing on maintaining a steady pace rather than bursts of speed could lead to a more balanced performance. Caseley should also work on his transition times between exercises. Practicing quick transitions in training would help him become more efficient during the race. Moreover, he should focus on his recovery during these transition periods to ensure he is ready for the next exercise.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Welsch Markus | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:26:33 | |
| Lyman Ronald | 2024 Dallas | 01:26:39 | |
| Duchhart Pim | 2024 Maastricht | 01:26:30 | |
| Kuusela Antti | 2023 Stockholm | 01:26:32 | |
| Rotger Y Verd Olivier | 2024 Paris | 01:25:56 | |
| Lapinskas Mantas | 2024 Gdansk | 01:26:16 | |
| Weerts Klaus | 2023 Hannover | 01:26:35 | |
| De Nooy Wolf | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:26:22 | |
| Sangster Chris | 2023 London | 01:25:47 | |
| Lanigan Lee | 2023 Madrid | 01:26:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Malaga | 01:22:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
