Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Levendosky John's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Levendosky John's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Levendosky John's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Levendosky John's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:02 | 47:45 to 43:43 | 70.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:52 | 06:21 to 05:29 | 15.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 05:48 to 05:00 | 14.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:13 to 02:11 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Levendosky John | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:04 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 04:04 | 04:31 -00:10 | 04:45 -00:41 |
| Running 2 | 05:38 | 08:25 | 05:08 +00:30 | 09:16 -00:51 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 14:03 | 03:05 -00:41 | 14:24 -00:21 |
| Running 3 | 06:30 | 16:27 | 05:37 +00:53 | 17:29 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 05:48 | 22:57 | 05:15 +00:33 | 23:06 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 06:05 | 28:45 | 05:36 +00:29 | 28:21 +00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:21 | 34:50 | 05:45 +00:36 | 33:57 +00:53 |
| Running 5 | 06:21 | 41:11 | 05:47 +00:34 | 39:42 +01:29 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 47:32 | 04:55 -00:20 | 45:29 +02:03 |
| Running 6 | 06:14 | 52:07 | 05:37 +00:37 | 50:24 +01:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 58:21 | 02:17 -00:04 | 56:01 +02:20 |
| Running 7 | 06:21 | 01:00:34 | 05:36 +00:45 | 58:18 +02:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:36 | 01:06:55 | 05:28 -00:52 | 01:03:54 +03:01 |
| Running 8 | 06:37 | 01:11:31 | 06:19 +00:18 | 01:09:22 +02:09 |
| Wall Balls | 04:45 | 01:18:08 | 06:58 -02:13 | 01:15:41 +02:27 |
| Roxzone | 07:21 | 01:30:06 | 07:27 -00:06 | 01:30:06 |
John showed strength in some segments, with his best running lap time being 00:04:04, which was 00:31 faster than the average for his finish time. He also performed well in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, being 00:07 and 00:59 faster than the average, respectively.
However, there were areas where John can improve his performance. He struggled in the Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Sled Pull segments, being slower than the average for his finish time in these segments.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the specific training techniques and exercises mentioned, John Levendosky can enhance his performance in the areas that need improvement and continue to excel in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fink Florian | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:30:18 | |
| Aytekin Firat | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:20 | |
| Mcintyre Shane | 2024 Dublin | 01:30:36 | |
| Bastjaens Pierre | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:30:09 | |
| Katzenmeier Kurt | 2023 Hamburg | 01:29:46 | |
| Manders Yurien | 2024 Maastricht | 01:30:19 | |
| Le Corre Alexis | 2023 Paris | 01:29:50 | |
| Pfeilstucker Maximilian | 2022 Basel | 01:30:21 | |
| Fraser Calum | 2024 Glasgow | 01:30:32 | |
| Nowaczyk Leszek | 2024 London | 01:29:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Chicago | 01:42:23 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
