Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 811 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ciccio Federico's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ciccio Federico's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ciccio Federico's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ciccio Federico's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:22 | 53:33 to 51:11 | 51.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:25 | 07:48 to 06:23 | 30.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:45 | 08:02 to 07:17 | 16.3% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:20 to 05:17 | 1.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:47 to 02:46 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:21 to 03:21 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:47 to 05:47 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| Ciccio Federico | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:12 | 00:00 | 05:18 +00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 06:12 | 04:47 -00:04 | 05:18 +00:54 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 10:55 | 05:59 -00:41 | 10:05 +00:50 |
| Sled Push | 03:21 | 16:13 | 03:43 -00:22 | 16:04 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 06:23 | 19:34 | 06:36 -00:13 | 19:47 -00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 07:48 | 25:57 | 06:32 +01:16 | 26:23 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 08:23 | 33:45 | 06:35 +01:48 | 32:55 +00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:02 | 42:08 | 07:23 +00:39 | 39:30 +02:38 |
| Running 5 | 07:29 | 50:10 | 06:54 +00:35 | 46:53 +03:17 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 57:39 | 05:19 +00:01 | 53:47 +03:52 |
| Running 6 | 07:07 | 01:02:59 | 06:39 +00:28 | 59:06 +03:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:47 | 01:10:06 | 02:41 +00:06 | 01:05:45 +04:21 |
| Running 7 | 06:56 | 01:12:53 | 06:40 +00:16 | 01:08:26 +04:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:47 | 01:19:49 | 06:55 -01:08 | 01:15:06 +04:43 |
| Running 8 | 05:46 | 01:25:36 | 08:08 -02:22 | 01:22:01 +03:35 |
| Wall Balls | 05:38 | 01:31:22 | 08:52 -03:14 | 01:30:09 +01:13 |
| Roxzone | 12:00 | 01:48:54 | 09:53 +02:07 | 01:48:54 |
Federico Ciccio's performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox event showcased a mixed profile with certain strengths and areas for improvement. While his overall rank placed him in the top 86% of athletes, indicating room for progress, he demonstrated strong capabilities in certain segments such as the Wall Balls and Sandbag Lunges, both completed significantly faster than the average. His performance suggests a hybrid profile with a slight skew towards strength-based exercises, evident from his faster times in the Ski Erg and Sled Push, though his Total running time was notably slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in running endurance and speed. Federico's pacing was inconsistent, with a strong start in Running 2 and Running 3, but a noticeable slowdown in Running 4, indicating potential pacing issues or fatigue.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kua Andre | 2024 Singapore | 01:49:16 | |
| O Grady Ronan | 2024 Dublin | 01:48:44 | |
| Gaedtke Rene | 2022 Essen | 01:48:48 | |
| Perez Fernando | 2024 Madrid | 01:48:51 | |
| Lim Eng Koon | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:48:25 | |
| Kühnle Niko | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:48:44 | |
| Marxer Christoph | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:48:51 | |
| Notroff Sebastian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:48:50 | |
| Pernicone Massimo | 2024 Turin | 01:48:31 | |
| Jentsch Dominik | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:48:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rimini | 01:51:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
