Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chapman Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chapman Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chapman Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chapman Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:09 | 06:59 to 04:50 | 63.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:30 | 02:30 to 02:00 | 14.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:23 | 06:16 to 05:53 | 11.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:19 | 04:50 to 04:31 | 9.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:24 to 04:21 | 1.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:41 to 39:41 | 0.0% |
| Chapman Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:28 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 05:28 | 04:24 +00:00 | 04:33 +00:55 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 09:52 | 04:53 -00:20 | 08:57 +00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 14:25 | 02:52 -00:34 | 13:50 +00:35 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 16:43 | 05:18 -00:34 | 16:42 +00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:50 | 21:27 | 04:49 +00:01 | 22:00 -00:33 |
| Running 4 | 04:49 | 26:17 | 05:16 -00:27 | 26:49 -00:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:59 | 31:06 | 05:07 +01:52 | 32:05 -00:59 |
| Running 5 | 04:57 | 38:05 | 05:26 -00:29 | 37:12 +00:53 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 43:02 | 04:46 -00:11 | 42:38 +00:24 |
| Running 6 | 04:56 | 47:37 | 05:18 -00:22 | 47:24 +00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 52:33 | 02:08 +00:22 | 52:42 -00:09 |
| Running 7 | 04:47 | 55:03 | 05:17 -00:30 | 54:50 +00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:24 | 59:50 | 04:57 -00:33 | 01:00:07 -00:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:29 | 01:04:14 | 05:51 -00:22 | 01:05:04 -00:50 |
| Wall Balls | 06:16 | 01:09:43 | 06:16 +00:00 | 01:10:55 -01:12 |
| Roxzone | 07:57 | 01:23:50 | 06:39 +01:18 | 01:23:50 |
Andrew Chapman competed effectively in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, finishing in the top 30% of all athletes and the top 20% of his age group. Despite a slower start in the first running segment, Andrew progressively improved his running times, with his total running time being 02:24 faster than average. This indicates that Andrew has a strong runner's profile, displaying resilience and speed. However, his performance in the roxzone was slower than average which indicates that transitioning between exercises needs improvement.
Andrew should pay attention to his pacing at the start of the race, as starting too slow can impact the overall performance. He should aim for a steady and controlled pace from the beginning, which will allow for a strong finish. In addition, focusing on improving transition times between exercises will greatly impact his overall time. Lastly, incorporating more strength training in his routine will help balance his strong running abilities, leading to a more overall balanced performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sprich Daniel | 2022 Basel | 01:24:14 | |
| Barrett Ryan | 2021 Birmingham | 01:23:35 | |
| Bradley Alex | 2022 London | 01:24:20 | |
| Scharnweber Joe | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:23:42 | |
| Van Grootel Martijn | 2024 Maastricht | 01:23:46 | |
| Roberts Ben | 2023 Glasgow | 01:24:17 | |
| Brook Christopher | 2024 Poznan | 01:24:04 | |
| Talens Martijn | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:23:41 | |
| Fiske Mark | 2024 London | 01:23:29 | |
| Größler Michael | 2023 Hamburg | 01:23:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:53:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
