Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Holly's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Holly's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Holly's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Holly's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:35 | 07:27 to 05:52 | 39.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:05 | 06:10 to 05:05 | 27.0% |
| Run Total | 00:45 | 48:24 to 47:39 | 18.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:22 | 05:22 to 05:00 | 9.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 05:21 to 05:10 | 4.6% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:30 to 05:27 | 1.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:16 to 05:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:12 to 02:12 | 0.0% |
| Smith Holly | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:34 | 00:00 | 05:20 +01:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:21 | 06:34 | 05:13 +00:08 | 05:20 +01:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:29 | 11:55 | 05:46 -00:17 | 10:33 +01:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:19 | 17:24 | 02:52 -00:33 | 16:19 +01:05 |
| Running 3 | 05:48 | 19:43 | 06:05 -00:17 | 19:11 +00:32 |
| Sled Pull | 07:27 | 25:31 | 06:07 +01:20 | 25:16 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 06:10 | 32:58 | 06:05 +00:05 | 31:23 +01:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:16 | 39:08 | 06:41 -01:25 | 37:28 +01:40 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 44:24 | 06:15 -00:12 | 44:09 +00:15 |
| Rowing | 05:30 | 50:27 | 05:30 +00:00 | 50:24 +00:03 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 55:57 | 06:08 -00:12 | 55:54 +00:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 01:01:53 | 02:23 -00:11 | 01:02:02 -00:09 |
| Running 7 | 06:04 | 01:04:05 | 06:06 -00:02 | 01:04:25 -00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:22 | 01:10:09 | 05:09 +00:13 | 01:10:31 -00:22 |
| Running 8 | 06:23 | 01:15:31 | 06:40 -00:17 | 01:15:40 -00:09 |
| Wall Balls | 06:10 | 01:21:54 | 05:29 +00:41 | 01:22:20 -00:26 |
| Roxzone | 07:28 | 01:35:23 | 07:34 -00:06 | 01:35:23 |
Holly Smith has shown a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. Clinching the 732nd rank out of 4107 athletes, she falls in the top 17%, which is exceptional. Focusing on her total running time, we observe that she is faster than the average by 00:29. This indicates that Holly has a strong running profile. Her pacing seems to be well managed, with her best running lap clocking in at 00:05:29. However, certain segments suggest room for improvement, particularly regarding her strength training.
Considering Holly's performance in the race, the following strategies can be implemented for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| On Amelia | 2024 Incheon | 01:35:22 | |
| Kula Diana | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:35:48 | |
| Gao Tian | 2024 New York | 01:35:50 | |
| Baracaia Simona | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:35:24 | |
| De Gruiter Melissa | 2024 Maastricht | 01:35:01 | |
| Codenotti Desiree | 2023 Malaga | 01:35:35 | |
| Pickering Danielle | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:18 | |
| Fitzpatrick Audrey | 2024 Dublin | 01:35:53 | |
| Hyslop Emma | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:38 | |
| Wong Isabel | 2024 Singapore | 01:34:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:20:19 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:25 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:24:01 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
