Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Scott Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Scott Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Scott Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Scott Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:35 | 43:04 to 41:29 | 42.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:36 | 03:17 to 02:41 | 16.2% |
| Rowing | 00:30 | 05:13 to 04:43 | 13.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 05:12 to 04:48 | 10.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:20 | 06:21 to 06:01 | 9.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 05:12 to 04:58 | 6.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:25 to 04:22 | 1.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Scott Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:41 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 04:41 | 04:26 -00:01 | 04:36 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 09:06 | 04:57 -00:12 | 09:02 +00:04 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 13:51 | 02:53 +00:24 | 13:59 -00:08 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 17:08 | 05:23 +00:10 | 16:52 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 04:32 | 22:41 | 04:55 -00:23 | 22:15 +00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:58 | 27:13 | 05:21 +00:37 | 27:10 +00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:12 | 33:11 | 05:18 -00:06 | 32:31 +00:40 |
| Running 5 | 06:04 | 38:23 | 05:31 +00:33 | 37:49 +00:34 |
| Rowing | 05:13 | 44:27 | 04:49 +00:24 | 43:20 +01:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:19 | 49:40 | 05:23 -00:04 | 48:09 +01:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 54:59 | 02:11 -00:12 | 53:32 +01:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 56:58 | 05:22 -00:17 | 55:43 +01:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:12 | 01:02:03 | 05:06 +00:06 | 01:01:05 +00:58 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:07:15 | 05:58 -00:15 | 01:06:11 +01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 06:21 | 01:12:58 | 06:31 -00:10 | 01:12:09 +00:49 |
| Roxzone | 06:16 | 01:25:27 | 06:47 -00:31 | 01:25:27 |
Kevin Scott's performance in the 2024 Glasgow HYROX race places him within the top 54% of all athletes and in the top 52% of his age group, highlighting a commendable level of overall fitness and competence in a highly competitive field. His overall time was 01:25:27, with a total running time of 00:43:08, slightly slower than the average. This suggests Kevin has a well-rounded athlete profile with a slight inclination towards strength exercises over running. Notably, his performance in the early running segments indicates he may have started the race at a pace slightly faster than optimal, which could have impacted his stamina in later segments.
By focusing on these targeted training strategies and race tactics, Kevin Scott can leverage his strengths and address his areas for improvement, setting the stage for enhanced performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Möhlmann Thomas | 2024 Köln | 01:25:30 | |
| Tillack Martin | 2024 Köln | 01:25:30 | |
| Jin Jayden | 2024 Singapore | 01:25:41 | |
| Krumrey Zach | 2023 Houston | 01:25:00 | |
| Yatco Jeremy | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:25:21 | |
| Jones Daniel | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:12 | |
| Scheiner Steve | 2022 Essen | 01:25:04 | |
| Turbitt Niall | 2024 London | 01:25:13 | |
| Wohnhas Tobias | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:25:11 | |
| De Jonge Adrie | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:25:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:10:31 | |
| 2024 Paris | 01:18:43 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
