Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ropata Frank's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ropata Frank's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ropata Frank's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ropata Frank's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:55 | 06:30 to 05:35 | 56.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:42 | 06:39 to 05:57 | 43.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:03 to 06:03 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:13 to 45:13 | 0.0% |
| Ropata Frank | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:03 | 05:12 | 04:35 -00:32 | 04:58 +00:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 09:15 | 05:23 -00:23 | 09:33 -00:18 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 14:15 | 03:12 -00:47 | 14:56 -00:41 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 16:40 | 05:53 -00:39 | 18:08 -01:28 |
| Sled Pull | 04:21 | 21:54 | 05:30 -01:09 | 24:01 -02:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:52 | 26:15 | 05:52 +00:00 | 29:31 -03:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:39 | 32:07 | 06:10 +00:29 | 35:23 -03:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 38:46 | 06:04 -00:30 | 41:33 -02:47 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 44:20 | 05:01 -00:18 | 47:37 -03:17 |
| Running 6 | 06:28 | 49:03 | 05:54 +00:34 | 52:38 -03:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 55:31 | 02:24 -00:46 | 58:32 -03:01 |
| Running 7 | 05:39 | 57:09 | 05:53 -00:14 | 01:00:56 -03:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:30 | 01:02:48 | 05:47 +00:43 | 01:06:49 -04:01 |
| Running 8 | 06:18 | 01:09:18 | 06:46 -00:28 | 01:12:36 -03:18 |
| Wall Balls | 06:03 | 01:15:36 | 07:25 -01:22 | 01:19:22 -03:46 |
| Roxzone | 13:19 | 01:34:48 | 08:01 +05:18 | 01:34:48 |
Frank Ropata's performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX race was commendable, finishing in the top 44% overall and top 46% in his age group. His overall time of 01:34:48 and a total running time of 00:45:13, which was 01:54 faster than average, highlight his proficiency in running. Frank's ability to maintain a faster-than-average pace, especially in running segments 2, 3, 5, and 8, showcases his strong running capabilities. However, the slower start in Running 1 suggests he may have paced himself cautiously, which could indicate room for strategic pacing improvements. Overall, Frank exhibits a hybrid profile with a slight edge in running, as evidenced by his faster running times and competency in strength exercises like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Sled Pull.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lombardi Anthony | 2022 London | 01:35:02 | |
| Valle Carrera Giovanni | 2022 Madrid | 01:35:16 | |
| Bold Callum | 2022 Birmingham | 01:35:01 | |
| Salleras Paul | 2024 Berlin | 01:34:38 | |
| Gorgenson Ian | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:34:35 | |
| Lentz Julian | 2022 Hamburg | 01:34:21 | |
| Beevor Ian | 2024 Gdansk | 01:35:04 | |
| Eschler André | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:34:34 | |
| Schefer Pascal | 2023 München | 01:34:45 | |
| Häger Lasse | 2024 Milan | 01:34:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
