Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 957 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Quinn Megan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Quinn Megan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Quinn Megan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Quinn Megan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:28 | 06:05 to 04:37 | 29.1% |
| Run Total | 01:18 | 41:34 to 40:16 | 25.8% |
| Sled Pull | 01:03 | 05:33 to 04:30 | 20.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:31 | 04:21 to 03:50 | 10.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:25 | 03:57 to 03:32 | 8.3% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 05:15 to 04:59 | 5.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 01:53 to 01:52 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Quinn Megan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:53 | 00:00 | 04:41 +00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 04:53 | 04:55 -00:14 | 04:41 +00:12 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 09:34 | 05:01 -00:13 | 09:36 -00:02 |
| Sled Push | 01:55 | 14:22 | 02:28 -00:33 | 14:37 -00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 16:17 | 05:18 -00:10 | 17:05 -00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 05:33 | 21:25 | 05:00 +00:33 | 22:23 -00:58 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 26:58 | 05:17 +00:06 | 27:23 -00:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:05 | 32:21 | 05:05 +01:00 | 32:40 -00:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 38:26 | 05:24 +00:13 | 37:45 +00:41 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 44:03 | 05:08 +00:07 | 43:09 +00:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 49:18 | 05:19 -00:16 | 48:17 +01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 54:21 | 02:03 -00:10 | 53:36 +00:45 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 56:14 | 05:17 -00:02 | 55:39 +00:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:21 | 01:01:29 | 04:09 +00:12 | 01:00:56 +00:33 |
| Running 8 | 05:32 | 01:05:50 | 05:33 -00:01 | 01:05:05 +00:45 |
| Wall Balls | 03:57 | 01:11:22 | 04:10 -00:13 | 01:10:38 +00:44 |
| Roxzone | 05:24 | 01:20:33 | 05:45 -00:21 | 01:20:33 |
Megan Quinn delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 130 out of 1801 athletes, placing her in the top 7%. She also achieved a commendable rank of 29 in her age group. Megan completed the race in 01:20:33, with her total running time being 00:41:34, which is 00:45 faster than the average, indicating her strong running capabilities. Notably, her pacing was consistent, without starting off too fast or too slow. Megan's performance suggests a hybrid profile with a slight edge towards running, as she demonstrated speed in running segments but has room for improvement in strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moores Stefanie | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:20:29 | |
| August Anett | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:20:58 | |
| Breuer Lea | 2022 Leipzig | 01:20:56 | |
| Frost Julia | 2024 London | 01:21:01 | |
| Caballero Alvaro Laura | 2022 Wien | 01:20:17 | |
| Tronci Giulia | 2024 Milan | 01:21:02 | |
| Chatfield Alanna | 2024 Brisbane | 01:20:57 | |
| Tate Carson | 2023 Chicago | 01:20:47 | |
| Pastko Julie | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:20:55 | |
| Huntley Emma | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
