Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chatfield Alanna's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chatfield Alanna's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chatfield Alanna's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chatfield Alanna's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:46 | 44:02 to 40:16 | 69.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:36 | 04:26 to 03:50 | 11.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:26 | 04:56 to 04:30 | 8.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:26 | 05:03 to 04:37 | 8.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:04 to 01:52 | 3.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:12 to 03:12 | 0.0% |
| Chatfield Alanna | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:42 -01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 03:36 | 04:55 -00:12 | 04:42 -01:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 08:19 | 05:01 +00:09 | 09:37 -01:18 |
| Sled Push | 01:57 | 13:29 | 02:31 -00:34 | 14:38 -01:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 15:26 | 05:17 +00:14 | 17:09 -01:43 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 20:57 | 05:02 -00:06 | 22:26 -01:29 |
| Running 4 | 06:03 | 25:53 | 05:18 +00:45 | 27:28 -01:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 31:56 | 05:11 -00:08 | 32:46 -00:50 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 36:59 | 05:25 +00:11 | 37:57 -00:58 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 42:35 | 05:09 -00:11 | 43:22 -00:47 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 47:33 | 05:20 +00:30 | 48:31 -00:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 53:23 | 02:03 +00:01 | 53:51 -00:28 |
| Running 7 | 06:02 | 55:27 | 05:18 +00:44 | 55:54 -00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:26 | 01:01:29 | 04:11 +00:15 | 01:01:12 +00:17 |
| Running 8 | 06:18 | 01:05:55 | 05:34 +00:44 | 01:05:23 +00:32 |
| Wall Balls | 03:12 | 01:12:13 | 04:12 -01:00 | 01:10:57 +01:16 |
| Roxzone | 05:40 | 01:20:57 | 05:48 -00:08 | 01:20:57 |
Alanna Chatfield delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 126 out of 1014 athletes, placing her in the top 12% overall and 9% within her age group. Her overall time was 01:20:57, showcasing her competitive edge. Alanna's pacing strategy showed that she started strong in the initial segments, with Running 1 being significantly faster than average. However, as the race progressed, her running times became consistently slower than average, suggesting she might have started too fast, resulting in fatigue in later segments. Her overall running time was 00:44:02, which is slower than average, indicating that she has a strong strength profile but needs to improve her running efficiency. This suggests a more strength-oriented profile, with opportunities to enhance her endurance and running skills.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lodeiro Moreno Oihane | 2024 Bilbao | 01:20:31 | |
| Weel Manouk | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:16 | |
| Juk Jeike | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:48 | |
| Vaudin Hannah | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:20:47 | |
| Orzelski Lisa | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:21:19 | |
| Tiebe Winnie | 2022 Maastricht | 01:21:20 | |
| Pfandler Böbe | 2023 Wien | 01:21:18 | |
| Hartridge Jaide | 2024 London | 01:21:08 | |
| Henry Caoimhe | 2024 Madrid | 01:21:22 | |
| Maslin Indiana | 2023 Birmingham | 01:20:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
