Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pace Cameron's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pace Cameron's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pace Cameron's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pace Cameron's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:26 | 08:09 to 05:43 | 55.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:28 | 08:48 to 07:20 | 33.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 06:16 to 06:06 | 3.8% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:10 to 05:00 | 3.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:44 to 04:36 | 3.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:24 to 02:23 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:52 to 45:52 | 0.0% |
| Pace Cameron | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:56 | 00:00 | 05:00 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 04:56 | 04:37 +00:07 | 05:00 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 09:40 | 05:25 +00:03 | 09:37 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 15:08 | 03:15 -00:59 | 15:02 +00:06 |
| Running 3 | 06:35 | 17:24 | 05:58 +00:37 | 18:17 -00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 23:59 | 05:38 -01:07 | 24:15 -00:16 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 28:30 | 05:55 -00:25 | 29:53 -01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:16 | 34:00 | 06:21 -00:05 | 35:48 -01:48 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 40:16 | 06:09 -00:38 | 42:09 -01:53 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 45:47 | 05:03 +00:07 | 48:18 -02:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:35 | 50:57 | 05:59 -00:24 | 53:21 -02:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 56:32 | 02:26 -00:02 | 59:20 -02:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:34 | 58:56 | 05:57 -00:23 | 01:01:46 -02:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:09 | 01:04:30 | 05:55 +02:14 | 01:07:43 -03:13 |
| Running 8 | 06:46 | 01:12:39 | 06:51 -00:05 | 01:13:38 -00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 08:48 | 01:19:25 | 07:41 +01:07 | 01:20:29 -01:04 |
| Roxzone | 08:18 | 01:36:24 | 08:14 +00:04 | 01:36:24 |
Cameron Pace delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race. Overall, he ranked 838th out of 1801 athletes, placing in the top 46% of the field, and 189th in his age group, indicating a solid mid-pack performance. His total running time of 45:52 was 1:45 faster than the average, suggesting a strong running capability. This indicates a runner profile, despite some slower segments in the strength-based exercises. Cameron's pacing strategy was consistent, showing a balanced approach in the early running segments, neither starting too fast nor too slow.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Garg Mayank | 2024 London | 01:36:04 | |
| Bathel André | 2018 Hamburg | 01:36:44 | |
| Torres Rivera Luis Javier | 2024 Berlin | 01:36:16 | |
| Von Schmeling Philip | 2018 Hamburg | 01:36:38 | |
| Bourdim Jamel | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:36:18 | |
| Rath Andreas | 2022 Leipzig | 01:36:31 | |
| Bales David | 2023 Birmingham | 01:36:16 | |
| Rauch Peter | 2022 Wien | 01:36:42 | |
| Hammer Marc | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:36:49 | |
| Clarke Harry | 2024 Manchester | 01:36:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
