Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Oswald Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Oswald Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Oswald Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Oswald Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:35 | 08:04 to 05:29 | 67.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:38 | 05:07 to 04:29 | 16.5% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:10 to 04:51 | 8.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:17 | 05:17 to 05:00 | 7.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:13 to 02:11 | 0.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:48 to 02:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:54 to 05:54 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:51 to 42:51 | 0.0% |
| Oswald Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:42 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 04:42 | 04:31 +00:36 | 04:45 -00:03 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 09:49 | 05:08 -00:20 | 09:16 +00:33 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 14:37 | 03:05 -00:17 | 14:24 +00:13 |
| Running 3 | 04:57 | 17:25 | 05:37 -00:40 | 17:29 -00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:17 | 22:22 | 05:15 +00:02 | 23:06 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 27:39 | 05:36 -00:18 | 28:21 -00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:04 | 32:57 | 05:46 +02:18 | 33:57 -01:00 |
| Running 5 | 05:44 | 41:01 | 05:47 -00:03 | 39:43 +01:18 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 46:45 | 04:55 +00:15 | 45:30 +01:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:41 | 51:55 | 05:37 +00:04 | 50:25 +01:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 57:36 | 02:17 -00:04 | 56:02 +01:34 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 59:49 | 05:36 -00:09 | 58:19 +01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:33 | 01:05:16 | 05:28 -00:55 | 01:03:55 +01:21 |
| Running 8 | 06:17 | 01:09:49 | 06:19 -00:02 | 01:09:23 +00:26 |
| Wall Balls | 05:54 | 01:16:06 | 06:58 -01:04 | 01:15:42 +00:24 |
| Roxzone | 08:15 | 01:30:07 | 07:27 +00:48 | 01:30:07 |
Matt Oswald delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, finishing with a time of 01:30:07, ranking him in the top 37% both overall and within his age group. His total running time of 00:42:51 was 01:59 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. This suggests Matt excels in endurance and running efficiency. However, his pacing indicates a strong start, especially in the first four running segments, followed by a gradual decline, which might suggest energy conservation issues or strategic pacing needs. His ability to outperform the average in running segments highlights his potential as a runner, but his strength-based exercises such as the Burpees Broad Jump and Ski Erg suggest areas for improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Serzisko Tobias | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:30:34 | |
| Herbst Jim | 2020 Chicago | 01:29:47 | |
| Duah Solomon | 2023 London | 01:30:27 | |
| Seah Ethan | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:29:45 | |
| Smith Steve | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:30:15 | |
| Thakrar Kavit | 2023 London | 01:29:50 | |
| Jurca Vladpetru | 2023 London | 01:30:24 | |
| Brooks Ben | 2023 London | 01:29:50 | |
| Warner Richard | 2024 Madrid | 01:30:15 | |
| Mccalister Brad | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:30:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
