Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire O Regan James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights O Regan James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the O Regan James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve O Regan James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:48 | 06:57 to 05:09 | 42.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:33 | 08:03 to 06:30 | 36.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:33 | 05:57 to 05:24 | 13.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:17 | 05:14 to 04:57 | 6.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:12 to 02:10 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:58 to 42:58 | 0.0% |
| O Regan James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:42 | 00:00 | 04:47 -01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:08 | 03:42 | 04:30 -00:22 | 04:47 -01:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 07:50 | 05:06 +00:21 | 09:17 -01:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 13:17 | 03:03 -00:39 | 14:23 -01:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 15:41 | 05:36 -00:05 | 17:26 -01:45 |
| Sled Pull | 05:14 | 21:12 | 05:12 +00:02 | 23:02 -01:50 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 26:26 | 05:35 -00:03 | 28:14 -01:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:57 | 31:58 | 05:41 +00:16 | 33:49 -01:51 |
| Running 5 | 05:56 | 37:55 | 05:46 +00:10 | 39:30 -01:35 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 43:51 | 04:54 -00:21 | 45:16 -01:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 48:24 | 05:35 +00:04 | 50:10 -01:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 54:03 | 02:17 -00:05 | 55:45 -01:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 56:15 | 05:35 +00:05 | 58:02 -01:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:57 | 01:01:55 | 05:26 +01:31 | 01:03:37 -01:42 |
| Running 8 | 05:34 | 01:08:52 | 06:17 -00:43 | 01:09:03 -00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 08:03 | 01:14:26 | 06:55 +01:08 | 01:15:20 -00:54 |
| Roxzone | 07:14 | 01:29:34 | 07:19 -00:05 | 01:29:34 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on the splits analysis, James showed strength in certain segments, particularly in Running 1, Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, and Wall Balls. These segments were completed faster than average, indicating proficiency in strength-based exercises.
However, James struggled in segments such as Burpees Broad Jump, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls, where he lost significant time compared to the average finisher. This suggests that he may need to focus on improving his endurance and technique in these exercises.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on improving the identified segments, James O Regan can further enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hesmondhalgh Oliver | 2024 Milan | 01:29:47 | |
| Blokhuis Gijs | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:29:37 | |
| Adena Marco | 2020 Hannover | 01:29:35 | |
| Minazzi Ivan | 2024 Rimini | 01:30:04 | |
| Gonzalez José | 2023 Paris | 01:29:42 | |
| Vermeulen Sven | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:29:26 | |
| Chi Keung Wong | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:29:58 | |
| Holt Elliot | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:48 | |
| Michels Pascal | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:29:09 | |
| Martin Zak | 2023 Dallas | 01:29:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
