Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Menta Carmelo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Menta Carmelo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Menta Carmelo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Menta Carmelo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:01 | 44:00 to 41:59 | 43.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:10 | 06:15 to 05:05 | 24.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:48 | 05:42 to 04:54 | 17.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:26 | 05:08 to 04:42 | 9.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:09 | 06:17 to 06:08 | 3.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:08 to 02:04 | 1.4% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:48 to 04:45 | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:41 to 01:41 | 0.0% |
| Menta Carmelo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 04:40 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 04:29 | 04:27 -00:11 | 04:40 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 08:45 | 05:00 -00:30 | 09:07 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 01:41 | 13:15 | 02:56 -01:15 | 14:07 -00:52 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 14:56 | 05:26 -00:20 | 17:03 -02:07 |
| Sled Pull | 05:08 | 20:02 | 05:00 +00:08 | 22:29 -02:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 25:10 | 05:26 -00:07 | 27:29 -02:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:15 | 30:29 | 05:22 +00:53 | 32:55 -02:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 36:44 | 05:36 +00:02 | 38:17 -01:33 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 42:22 | 04:50 -00:02 | 43:53 -01:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 47:10 | 05:29 +00:17 | 48:43 -01:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 52:56 | 02:12 -00:04 | 54:12 -01:16 |
| Running 7 | 05:49 | 55:04 | 05:26 +00:23 | 56:24 -01:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:42 | 01:00:53 | 05:08 +00:34 | 01:01:50 -00:57 |
| Running 8 | 07:26 | 01:06:35 | 06:04 +01:22 | 01:06:58 -00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 06:17 | 01:14:01 | 06:35 -00:18 | 01:13:02 +00:59 |
| Roxzone | 06:24 | 01:26:34 | 06:57 -00:33 | 01:26:34 |
Carmelo Menta displayed a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 578 out of 1801 participants, which places him in the top 32%. Similarly, in his age group (45-49), he ranked 40th out of 123 athletes, maintaining the same percentile. His overall time of 01:26:34 is a respectable achievement in this competitive category.
Analyzing his pacing, Carmelo started strong, notably faster than average in the initial running segments, but his pace declined as the race progressed, indicating a possible initial overexertion. In terms of profile, his total running time was 00:44:00, which is 00:31 slower than average, suggesting that Carmelo has a stronger inclination towards strength-based exercises rather than running. However, his exceptional performance in running segments 1 to 4 indicates that he has potential in running but needs to sustain his pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wright Jonathan | 2023 Birmingham | 01:26:54 | |
| Fröhle Chris | 2023 Hamburg | 01:26:53 | |
| Davies Mark | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:02 | |
| Hamill Jamie | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:34 | |
| Szymański Mikołaj | 2024 Poznan | 01:26:14 | |
| Luna David | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:27:01 | |
| Fotland Øystein | 2022 Wien | 01:26:52 | |
| Armer Tom | 2023 London | 01:26:14 | |
| Carmichael Duncan | 2024 Cape Town | 01:26:04 | |
| Roberts Jack | 2022 London | 01:26:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:13:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
