Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Knobel Philippe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Knobel Philippe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Knobel Philippe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Knobel Philippe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:33 | 07:18 to 05:45 | 32.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:15 | 07:25 to 06:10 | 26.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:55 | 08:19 to 07:24 | 19.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:39 | 03:03 to 02:24 | 13.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:22 | 05:53 to 05:31 | 7.7% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:03 to 05:01 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:45 to 02:45 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:52 to 43:52 | 0.0% |
| Knobel Philippe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:52 | 00:00 | 04:59 +00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 05:52 | 04:37 -00:09 | 04:59 +00:53 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 10:20 | 05:26 -00:30 | 09:36 +00:44 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 15:16 | 03:17 -00:32 | 15:02 +00:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:13 | 18:01 | 05:59 -00:46 | 18:19 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 05:53 | 23:14 | 05:40 +00:13 | 24:18 -01:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 29:07 | 05:56 -00:33 | 29:58 -00:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:25 | 34:30 | 06:23 +01:02 | 35:54 -01:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:25 | 41:55 | 06:11 -00:46 | 42:17 -00:22 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 47:20 | 05:04 -00:01 | 48:28 -01:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 52:23 | 06:00 -00:35 | 53:32 -01:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:03 | 57:48 | 02:26 +00:37 | 59:32 -01:44 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 01:00:51 | 05:59 -00:24 | 01:01:58 -01:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:18 | 01:06:26 | 05:56 +01:22 | 01:07:57 -01:31 |
| Running 8 | 06:06 | 01:13:44 | 06:54 -00:48 | 01:13:53 -00:09 |
| Wall Balls | 08:19 | 01:19:50 | 07:44 +00:35 | 01:20:47 -00:57 |
| Roxzone | 08:46 | 01:36:47 | 08:16 +00:30 | 01:36:47 |
Philippe Knobel's performance in the 2024 Madrid Hyrox race was solid, placing him in the top 51% of 1509 athletes, and in the top 43% of his age group (55-59). His total running time was 3:45 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, he started slower in Running 1, potentially due to a cautious start or lack of warm-up, but he caught up in the subsequent running segments. This suggests that Philippe has the capacity for a faster start and can benefit from a more aggressive race strategy.
Philippe can benefit from a more aggressive start since his performance improved significantly after the first running segment. This could be achieved by a more extensive warm-up before the race. He should also focus on maintaining a steady pace throughout the race to conserve energy for the strength-based segments, considering his outstanding running profile. Additionally, practicing transitions between running and strength segments can help him save time in the Roxzone. Finally, incorporating the recommended strength exercises into his training routine will help him improve his performance in the identified weak segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Reekie Adam | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:36:45 | |
| Shakespeare Oliver | 2022 Birmingham | 01:36:58 | |
| Vit Philip | 2018 Wien | 01:36:48 | |
| Erasmo Andrea | 2023 Rimini | 01:37:16 | |
| Eze Chidera | 2024 Dublin | 01:36:21 | |
| Loi Alessandro | 2024 Turin | 01:37:02 | |
| Schofield Dylan | 2024 Sydney | 01:36:50 | |
| Pettersson Thomas | 2023 Stockholm | 01:36:50 | |
| Wijsman David | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:36:29 | |
| Street Michael | 2024 Poznan | 01:37:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Basel | 01:27:03 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
