Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Irwin Martin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Irwin Martin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Irwin Martin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Irwin Martin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:15 | 06:22 to 05:07 | 60.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:42 to 04:24 | 14.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:18 | 06:29 to 06:11 | 14.5% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:54 to 04:46 | 6.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 04:47 to 04:43 | 3.2% |
| Run Total | 00:01 | 42:10 to 42:09 | 0.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Irwin Martin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:56 | 00:00 | 04:43 +00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 04:56 | 04:28 +00:14 | 04:43 +00:13 |
| Running 2 | 04:22 | 09:38 | 05:01 -00:39 | 09:11 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:09 | 14:00 | 02:57 -00:48 | 14:12 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 16:09 | 05:27 -00:12 | 17:09 -01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:47 | 21:24 | 05:02 -00:15 | 22:36 -01:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 26:11 | 05:27 +00:01 | 27:38 -01:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:22 | 31:39 | 05:24 +00:58 | 33:05 -01:26 |
| Running 5 | 06:00 | 38:01 | 05:37 +00:23 | 38:29 -00:28 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 44:01 | 04:51 +00:03 | 44:06 -00:05 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 48:55 | 05:29 -00:12 | 48:57 -00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 54:12 | 02:13 -00:17 | 54:26 -00:14 |
| Running 7 | 04:53 | 56:08 | 05:28 -00:35 | 56:39 -00:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:52 | 01:01:01 | 05:11 -00:19 | 01:02:07 -01:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:05:53 | 06:06 -00:03 | 01:07:18 -01:25 |
| Wall Balls | 06:29 | 01:11:56 | 06:37 -00:08 | 01:13:24 -01:28 |
| Roxzone | 08:48 | 01:27:04 | 07:03 +01:45 | 01:27:04 |
Martin Irwin put forth a commendable performance, ranking in the top 36% overall and top 34% in his age group. He showcased an impressive running profile, with his total running time being 01:23 faster than average. His best running lap was clocked at 00:04:22, further underlining his aptitude for running. However, it's noteworthy that Martin started slower than average in the initial running segment, but improved significantly in the later stages. This suggests a potential for better pacing at the start of the race.
Effective race strategies for Martin would include starting at a slightly faster pace to make the most of his running strength. This could help him gain time in the initial stages of the race. He should also focus on maintaining a steady pace throughout the race, rather than slowing down significantly in the later stages. Developing a routine for transitions can help decrease Roxzone time. Finally, incorporating regular strength training along with running can help Martin improve his overall fitness and performance in strength-based segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schellhammer Lorenz | 2024 Hamburg | 01:26:46 | |
| Thomson Derek | 2023 Glasgow | 01:27:09 | |
| Morris Alex | 2023 London | 01:26:43 | |
| Muñoz Alonso Ivan | 2023 Valencia | 01:26:58 | |
| Lake Jason | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:14 | |
| Nguyen Anthony | 2024 Houston | 01:26:37 | |
| Febus Guido | 2024 Maastricht | 01:27:27 | |
| Zammit Cachia Edward | 2024 Madrid | 01:27:20 | |
| Engelschalt Paul | 2021 Berlin | 01:27:21 | |
| Carrington Nicholas | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
