Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Heaney Mae's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Heaney Mae's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Heaney Mae's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Heaney Mae's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:30 | 53:25 to 46:55 | 95.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 06:03 to 05:43 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:37 to 05:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:53 to 02:53 | 0.0% |
| Heaney Mae | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:28 | 00:00 | 05:17 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 05:28 | 05:12 -00:24 | 05:17 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 10:16 | 05:40 -00:13 | 10:29 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 01:48 | 15:43 | 02:53 -01:05 | 16:09 -00:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:50 | 17:31 | 06:00 -00:10 | 19:02 -01:31 |
| Sled Pull | 06:03 | 23:21 | 06:03 +00:00 | 25:02 -01:41 |
| Running 4 | 06:07 | 29:24 | 06:01 +00:06 | 31:05 -01:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:37 | 35:31 | 06:38 -01:01 | 37:06 -01:35 |
| Running 5 | 06:37 | 41:08 | 06:11 +00:26 | 43:44 -02:36 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 47:45 | 05:28 -00:21 | 49:55 -02:10 |
| Running 6 | 06:11 | 52:52 | 06:04 +00:07 | 55:23 -02:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 59:03 | 02:22 -00:28 | 01:01:27 -02:24 |
| Running 7 | 09:07 | 01:00:57 | 06:04 +03:03 | 01:03:49 -02:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:35 | 01:10:04 | 05:04 -00:29 | 01:09:53 +00:11 |
| Running 8 | 08:41 | 01:14:39 | 06:33 +02:08 | 01:14:57 -00:18 |
| Wall Balls | 02:53 | 01:23:20 | 05:21 -02:28 | 01:21:30 +01:50 |
| Roxzone | 08:05 | 01:34:09 | 07:18 +00:47 | 01:34:09 |
Mae Heaney delivered a strong performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, finishing in the top 21% overall and the top 18% in her age group. Her overall time was 01:34:09 with an overall rank of 390 out of 1801 athletes. Notably, Mae excels in strength-based events, as evidenced by top percentile ranks in exercises like the Sled Push and Wall Balls, where she was significantly faster than average.
However, her overall running time was 05:03 slower than average, indicating that running is an area for improvement. The slower splits in the later running segments suggest she may have started too fast in the initial stages, resulting in fatigue. Mae's profile leans towards strength, so focusing on enhancing her running endurance will be key to improving her overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory Zoë | 2022 Manchester | 01:33:50 | |
| Jenkins Louise | 2023 Glasgow | 01:33:50 | |
| Väth Klara | 2021 Leipzig | 01:34:20 | |
| Marks Christiane | 2022 Hamburg | 01:34:00 | |
| Lignell Marjaana | 2024 Malaga | 01:34:01 | |
| Maiworm Sarah | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:34:34 | |
| Aguinaga Fiel Iciar | 2022 Madrid | 01:34:31 | |
| Foster Caroline | 2023 London | 01:33:45 | |
| Janssen Marlous | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:34:32 | |
| Martin Olivia | 2024 Birmingham | 01:34:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:26:13 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
