Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Haszard Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Haszard Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Haszard Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Haszard Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:59 | 04:32 to 03:33 | 22.8% |
| Run Total | 00:55 | 35:05 to 34:10 | 21.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:47 | 04:09 to 03:22 | 18.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:40 | 05:02 to 04:22 | 15.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:32 | 02:05 to 01:33 | 12.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:13 | 03:37 to 03:24 | 5.0% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:28 to 04:19 | 3.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:05 to 04:01 | 1.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:47 to 01:47 | 0.0% |
| Haszard Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 03:57 -00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 03:41 | 04:10 -00:05 | 03:57 -00:16 |
| Running 2 | 04:04 | 07:46 | 04:13 -00:09 | 08:07 -00:21 |
| Sled Push | 01:47 | 11:50 | 02:26 -00:39 | 12:20 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 04:48 | 13:37 | 04:29 +00:19 | 14:46 -01:09 |
| Sled Pull | 03:37 | 18:25 | 03:54 -00:17 | 19:15 -00:50 |
| Running 4 | 04:32 | 22:02 | 04:29 +00:03 | 23:09 -01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:09 | 26:34 | 03:54 +00:15 | 27:38 -01:04 |
| Running 5 | 04:44 | 30:43 | 04:36 +00:08 | 31:32 -00:49 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 35:27 | 04:26 +00:02 | 36:08 -00:41 |
| Running 6 | 04:30 | 39:55 | 04:31 -00:01 | 40:34 -00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 44:25 | 01:47 +00:18 | 45:05 -00:40 |
| Running 7 | 04:08 | 46:30 | 04:30 -00:22 | 46:52 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:32 | 50:38 | 03:58 +00:34 | 51:22 -00:44 |
| Running 8 | 04:43 | 55:10 | 04:48 -00:05 | 55:20 -00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 05:02 | 59:53 | 04:54 +00:08 | 01:00:08 -00:15 |
| Roxzone | 05:13 | 01:09:58 | 04:56 +00:17 | 01:09:58 |
Andrew Haszard has demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 72 among 1801 athletes, placing him in the top 3%. In his age group, he ranks 23rd, showing his competitive edge. His overall time of 01:09:58 is impressive, particularly with a total running time of 00:35:05, which is 00:50 faster than the average. This indicates a strong runner's profile. Andrew's pacing strategy appeared to be slightly aggressive at the start, as seen in his faster-than-average times for Running 1 and Running 2, but he maintained a consistent pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Reffgen Phillip | 2024 Hamburg | 01:09:35 | |
| Ravenstijn Dennis | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:09:47 | |
| Littler Jay | 2024 Berlin | 01:09:37 | |
| Lynch Paul | 2024 Malaga | 01:10:25 | |
| Carmona Mansilla Javier | 2024 Bilbao | 01:09:28 | |
| Willems Patrick | 2023 Köln | 01:09:54 | |
| Halstenberg Linus | 2024 Hamburg | 01:09:44 | |
| ScottYoung Steven | 2024 Melbourne | 01:09:50 | |
| Michalski Mariusz | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:09:57 | |
| Gulla Daniel | 2024 Berlin | 01:09:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
