Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ravenstijn Dennis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ravenstijn Dennis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ravenstijn Dennis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ravenstijn Dennis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:35 | 37:45 to 34:10 | 66.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 04:05 to 03:24 | 12.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:25 | 04:47 to 04:22 | 7.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 | 01:56 to 01:33 | 7.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 02:12 to 01:57 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:04 to 04:01 | 0.9% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:22 to 04:19 | 0.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:05 to 03:05 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:17 to 03:17 | 0.0% |
| Ravenstijn Dennis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:58 | 00:00 | 03:57 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 02:58 | 04:10 -00:06 | 03:57 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 04:24 | 07:02 | 04:12 +00:12 | 08:07 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:12 | 11:26 | 02:26 -00:14 | 12:19 -00:53 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 13:38 | 04:28 +00:30 | 14:45 -01:07 |
| Sled Pull | 04:05 | 18:36 | 03:54 +00:11 | 19:13 -00:37 |
| Running 4 | 04:48 | 22:41 | 04:28 +00:20 | 23:07 -00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:05 | 27:29 | 03:53 -00:48 | 27:35 -00:06 |
| Running 5 | 04:50 | 30:34 | 04:35 +00:15 | 31:28 -00:54 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 35:24 | 04:26 -00:04 | 36:03 -00:39 |
| Running 6 | 04:50 | 39:46 | 04:30 +00:20 | 40:29 -00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 44:36 | 01:47 +00:09 | 44:59 -00:23 |
| Running 7 | 04:50 | 46:32 | 04:30 +00:20 | 46:46 -00:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:17 | 51:22 | 03:57 -00:40 | 51:16 +00:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:11 | 54:39 | 04:47 +01:24 | 55:13 -00:34 |
| Wall Balls | 04:47 | 01:00:50 | 04:54 -00:07 | 01:00:00 +00:50 |
| Roxzone | 04:19 | 01:09:47 | 04:53 -00:34 | 01:09:47 |
Based on the splits analysis, Dennis excelled in the Running 1 and Burpees Broad Jump segments, where he was significantly faster than average. This highlights his agility and explosive power. On the other hand, he struggled in the Running 3, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8 segments, where he was slower than average. These segments indicate a need for improvement in endurance and stamina.
Overall, Dennis Ravenstijn showcased impressive athleticism and potential in the HYROX race. By focusing on his endurance, pacing, and transition time, he can further improve his performance and continue to excel in future races. Incorporating the suggested training strategies and techniques will play a vital role in his journey towards becoming an even stronger and more well-rounded athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mathie Kris | 2024 Manchester | 01:09:51 | |
| Ferro Gianluca | 2024 Rimini | 01:09:35 | |
| Pearshouse Alex | 2023 Manchester | 01:09:21 | |
| Beyer Dirk | 2021 Berlin | 01:09:36 | |
| Jessop Thomas | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:10:02 | |
| It Riccardo | 2023 Milan | 01:09:36 | |
| BihanPoudec Louis | 2024 Paris | 01:10:16 | |
| Duffield Luke | 2024 Glasgow | 01:10:09 | |
| Bosbach Philipp | 2024 Köln | 01:09:35 | |
| Donga Remko | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:10:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:10:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
