Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 38 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Do Long's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Do Long's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Do Long's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Do Long's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 30:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 20:04 | 01:19:43 to 59:39 | 65.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:42 | 15:49 to 09:07 | 21.8% |
| Sled Pull | 02:55 | 10:47 to 07:52 | 9.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:59 | 04:19 to 03:20 | 3.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:01 | 08:27 to 08:26 | 0.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:47 to 03:47 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:10 to 07:10 | 0.0% |
| Do Long | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:52 | 00:00 | 06:40 -00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 05:52 | 05:12 -00:12 | 06:40 -00:48 |
| Running 2 | 07:16 | 10:52 | 07:28 -00:12 | 11:52 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 03:47 | 18:08 | 04:36 -00:49 | 19:20 -01:12 |
| Running 3 | 08:11 | 21:55 | 08:35 -00:24 | 23:56 -02:01 |
| Sled Pull | 10:47 | 30:06 | 09:21 +01:26 | 32:31 -02:25 |
| Running 4 | 08:48 | 40:53 | 08:49 -00:01 | 41:52 -00:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 15:49 | 49:41 | 11:26 +04:23 | 50:41 -01:00 |
| Running 5 | 12:32 | 01:05:30 | 09:33 +02:59 | 01:02:07 +03:23 |
| Rowing | 05:35 | 01:18:02 | 06:10 -00:35 | 01:11:40 +06:22 |
| Running 6 | 12:50 | 01:23:37 | 09:00 +03:50 | 01:17:50 +05:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:19 | 01:36:27 | 03:34 +00:45 | 01:26:50 +09:37 |
| Running 7 | 11:38 | 01:40:46 | 09:07 +02:31 | 01:30:24 +10:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:27 | 01:52:24 | 11:24 -02:57 | 01:39:31 +12:53 |
| Running 8 | 12:40 | 02:00:51 | 13:54 -01:14 | 01:50:55 +09:56 |
| Wall Balls | 07:10 | 02:13:31 | 13:02 -05:52 | 02:04:49 +08:42 |
| Roxzone | 11:23 | 02:31:54 | 14:03 -02:40 | 02:31:54 |
Long Do's performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX event placed him in the top 63% overall and top 68% in his age group. His running performance, with a total time of 01:19:43, was 7:18 slower than average, indicating that he might benefit from focusing more on running endurance and speed. However, his performance in strength-based segments, notably the Wall Balls, was exceptional, suggesting a strong strength profile. His initial pacing was somewhat aggressive, as evidenced by faster than average times in the first few running segments, but he struggled to maintain this pace in later stages, specifically in running segments 5, 6, and 7.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ramsden Jack | 2022 London | 02:31:31 | |
| Picasales Louwiel | 2024 Singapore | 02:31:33 | |
| Wicklund Brandon | 2023 Miami | 02:32:20 | |
| Jover Juan Cesar | 2022 Madrid | 02:31:24 | |
| Baumann Guy | 2023 Manchester | 02:32:01 | |
| Mcgovern Alan | 2023 Dublin | 02:31:48 | |
| Mckeegan Chris | 2023 Barcelona | 02:31:29 | |
| Rock Sebastian | 2023 Malmö | 02:31:52 | |
| Behets David | 2024 Rotterdam | 02:31:55 | |
| Lim Wei Ji | 2024 Singapore | 02:31:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
