Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cross Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cross Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cross Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cross Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:50 | 45:19 to 41:29 | 91.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:16 | 06:17 to 06:01 | 6.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:08 to 02:02 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:43 to 01:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Cross Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:09 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 05:09 | 04:26 -00:21 | 04:35 +00:34 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 09:14 | 04:55 +00:02 | 09:01 +00:13 |
| Sled Push | 01:43 | 14:11 | 02:51 -01:08 | 13:56 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:12 | 15:54 | 05:22 -00:10 | 16:47 -00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 03:45 | 21:06 | 04:53 -01:08 | 22:09 -01:03 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 24:51 | 05:20 +00:10 | 27:02 -02:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:50 | 30:21 | 05:17 -00:27 | 32:22 -02:01 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 35:11 | 05:30 +00:37 | 37:39 -02:28 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 41:18 | 04:48 -00:09 | 43:09 -01:51 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 45:57 | 05:22 +00:27 | 47:57 -02:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 51:46 | 02:10 -00:02 | 53:19 -01:33 |
| Running 7 | 05:44 | 53:54 | 05:21 +00:23 | 55:29 -01:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:14 | 59:38 | 05:03 -00:49 | 01:00:50 -01:12 |
| Running 8 | 06:54 | 01:03:52 | 05:57 +00:57 | 01:05:53 -02:01 |
| Wall Balls | 06:17 | 01:10:46 | 06:26 -00:09 | 01:11:50 -01:04 |
| Roxzone | 08:04 | 01:25:01 | 06:45 +01:19 | 01:25:01 |
Nick Cross delivered a solid performance during the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, finishing in the top 28% overall and top 29% in his age group. His overall time was 01:25:01. Notably, Nick demonstrated a strong proficiency in strength-based exercises, particularly excelling in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, ranking in the top 2% and 8% respectively. However, his total running time was 00:45:19, which is 02:33 slower than the average, indicating an area for improvement in running efficiency. Nick's performance in the early running segments suggests he started slightly slower than average, which might indicate a conservative pacing strategy. His Roxzone time was also slower than average, suggesting he could benefit from working on transitions and overall fitness to reduce rest durations. Overall, Nick exhibits a hybrid profile with a notable strength advantage, though improvement in running could enhance his overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schafer Tobin | 2024 Dallas | 01:24:51 | |
| Riedlinger Thorben | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:24:32 | |
| Doris Michael | 2023 London | 01:24:31 | |
| Mceneany Sam | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:14 | |
| Malpas Aaron | 2023 London | 01:25:01 | |
| Mußbach Marvin | 2019 Essen | 01:24:40 | |
| Losiniecki Matthew | 2022 Dallas | 01:24:56 | |
| Dean Tom | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:44 | |
| Cooke Matthew | 2024 Dublin | 01:25:07 | |
| Masiero Enrico Maria | 2024 Turin | 01:24:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
