Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clements James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clements James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clements James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clements James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 00:59 | 03:11 to 02:12 | 33.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 06:20 to 05:32 | 27.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:36 | 05:38 to 05:02 | 20.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:43 to 04:29 | 8.0% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 05:01 to 04:52 | 5.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 05:23 to 05:15 | 4.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:01 | 06:40 to 06:39 | 0.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:52 to 42:52 | 0.0% |
| Clements James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 04:45 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 04:51 | 04:32 +00:11 | 04:45 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 09:34 | 05:10 -00:15 | 09:17 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 14:29 | 03:04 -00:21 | 14:27 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:20 | 17:12 | 05:38 -00:18 | 17:31 -00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 05:38 | 22:32 | 05:16 +00:22 | 23:09 -00:37 |
| Running 4 | 05:06 | 28:10 | 05:37 -00:31 | 28:25 -00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:20 | 33:16 | 05:48 +00:32 | 34:02 -00:46 |
| Running 5 | 05:54 | 39:36 | 05:49 +00:05 | 39:50 -00:14 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 45:30 | 04:56 +00:05 | 45:39 -00:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:07 | 50:31 | 05:39 -00:32 | 50:35 -00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:11 | 55:38 | 02:18 +00:53 | 56:14 -00:36 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 58:49 | 05:38 -00:23 | 58:32 +00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:23 | 01:04:04 | 05:30 -00:07 | 01:04:10 -00:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:26 | 01:09:27 | 06:20 +00:06 | 01:09:40 -00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 06:40 | 01:15:53 | 07:00 -00:20 | 01:16:00 -00:07 |
| Roxzone | 08:00 | 01:30:29 | 07:29 +00:31 | 01:30:29 |
James Clements showcased a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, achieving an overall rank of 696, placing him in the top 38% of all competitors. Within his age group (25-29), he also ranked in the top 38%. His overall completion time was 01:30:29. Notably, James exhibited a strong running profile, with a total running time of 42:52, which was 02:06 faster than the average. This indicates a proficient running ability. Additionally, James demonstrated a strategic start, pacing himself effectively in the first four running segments, gradually improving his time compared to the average. However, his performance in strength-based exercises suggests room for improvement, indicating that he could benefit from enhancing his strength and transition efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stabile Joseph | 2019 New York | 01:30:29 | |
| Aikens Rik | 2022 Maastricht | 01:30:48 | |
| Duff Ben | 2023 Manchester | 01:30:29 | |
| Hall Jaime | 2022 Birmingham | 01:30:46 | |
| Howlin Michael | 2024 Berlin | 01:30:58 | |
| Slot Oscar | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:30:04 | |
| Brookman Christian | 2024 Anaheim | 01:30:03 | |
| Kreutz Dominik | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:30:46 | |
| Villamagna Diego | 2024 Rimini | 01:30:23 | |
| Glansbeek Alexander | 2024 Maastricht | 01:30:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
