Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 723 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Burchfield Scott's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Burchfield Scott hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Burchfield Scott’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Burchfield Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:32 | 53:35 to 52:03 | 53.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:56 | 07:48 to 06:52 | 32.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:18 | 07:46 to 07:28 | 10.4% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:27 to 05:20 | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:12 to 03:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:53 to 06:53 | 0.0% |
| Burchfield Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:37 | 00:00 | 05:25 +00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 05:37 | 04:47 -00:09 | 05:25 +00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 10:15 | 06:02 -00:34 | 10:12 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 03:12 | 15:43 | 03:43 -00:31 | 16:14 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 18:55 | 06:43 -00:54 | 19:57 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 05:26 | 24:44 | 06:32 -01:06 | 26:40 -01:56 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 30:10 | 06:43 -00:41 | 33:12 -03:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:46 | 36:12 | 07:33 +00:13 | 39:55 -03:43 |
| Running 5 | 06:20 | 43:58 | 07:01 -00:41 | 47:28 -03:30 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 50:18 | 05:21 +00:06 | 54:29 -04:11 |
| Running 6 | 06:11 | 55:45 | 06:47 -00:36 | 59:50 -04:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 01:01:56 | 02:45 -00:57 | 01:06:37 -04:41 |
| Running 7 | 06:10 | 01:03:44 | 06:51 -00:41 | 01:09:22 -05:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:48 | 01:09:54 | 06:59 +00:49 | 01:16:13 -06:19 |
| Running 8 | 12:00 | 01:17:42 | 08:24 +03:36 | 01:23:12 -05:30 |
| Wall Balls | 06:53 | 01:29:42 | 09:07 -02:14 | 01:31:36 -01:54 |
| Roxzone | 14:28 | 01:50:56 | 10:13 +04:15 | 01:50:56 |
Scott Burchfield demonstrated a solid performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, finishing with an overall time of 01:50:56, placing him in the top 57% of all participants and top 60% within his age group. His total running time of 00:53:35 was notably 00:56 faster than the average, indicating a strong running ability. However, his performance in the Roxzone was significantly below average, suggesting room for improvement in transitions and overall fitness. The initial running segments showed some variability, with a slow start in Running 1, but he quickly gained pace, indicating a potential need for more consistent pacing. Scott's performance suggests a hybrid profile with a slight edge in running over strength-based components.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgewood Alan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:50:42 | |
| Chiorean Razvan | 2024 London | 01:50:35 | |
| Tonon Alessandro | 2024 Turin | 01:51:18 | |
| Ng Chin Hong | 2024 Singapore | 01:51:01 | |
| Raccagni Giovanni Luigi | 2023 Milan | 01:51:21 | |
| Smith James | 2024 London | 01:51:20 | |
| Bentien Ronald | 2024 Hamburg | 01:51:24 | |
| Allegrini Marco | 2024 Milan | 01:51:07 | |
| Quilligan Mark | 2023 Dublin | 01:51:05 | |
| Neubert Patrick | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:50:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:38:21 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
