Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 280 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brouwer Dee's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brouwer Dee's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brouwer Dee's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brouwer Dee's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 27:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 26:18 | 01:22:41 to 56:23 | 95.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:48 | 08:34 to 07:46 | 2.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:27 | 04:46 to 04:19 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:16 to 08:16 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:43 to 07:43 | 0.0% |
| Brouwer Dee | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:13 | 00:00 | 05:47 -02:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 03:13 | 04:58 -00:14 | 05:47 -02:34 |
| Running 2 | 13:57 | 07:57 | 06:30 +07:27 | 10:45 -02:48 |
| Sled Push | 04:46 | 21:54 | 04:19 +00:27 | 17:15 +04:39 |
| Running 3 | 07:35 | 26:40 | 07:31 +00:04 | 21:34 +05:06 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 34:15 | 07:12 -02:23 | 29:05 +05:10 |
| Running 4 | 10:18 | 39:04 | 07:29 +02:49 | 36:17 +02:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:16 | 49:22 | 08:50 -00:34 | 43:46 +05:36 |
| Running 5 | 10:21 | 57:38 | 07:56 +02:25 | 52:36 +05:02 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 01:07:59 | 05:37 -00:36 | 01:00:32 +07:27 |
| Running 6 | 07:07 | 01:13:00 | 07:30 -00:23 | 01:06:09 +06:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 01:20:07 | 02:56 -01:00 | 01:13:39 +06:28 |
| Running 7 | 08:28 | 01:22:03 | 07:31 +00:57 | 01:16:35 +05:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:34 | 01:30:31 | 08:19 +00:15 | 01:24:06 +06:25 |
| Running 8 | 11:46 | 01:39:05 | 09:52 +01:54 | 01:32:25 +06:40 |
| Wall Balls | 07:43 | 01:50:51 | 10:48 -03:05 | 01:42:17 +08:34 |
| Roxzone | 05:56 | 02:04:23 | 11:18 -05:22 | 02:04:23 |
Dee Brouwer performed well in the 2022 Maastricht Hyrox race, finishing with an overall rank of 236 out of 337 athletes, placing him in the top 70% of participants. In his age group (30-34), he ranked 42 out of 61 athletes, putting him in the top 68%. His overall time was 02:04:23, with a total running time of 01:22:41, which was 24:35 slower than the average.
When analyzing the splits, it is evident that Dee excelled in certain segments such as Running 1 and Sled Pull, where he performed significantly better than the average time. However, he struggled in segments like Running 2, Running 4, Running 5, Running 7, and Sandbag Lunges, where he lost valuable time compared to the average.
Dee's pacing throughout the race seems to be inconsistent. He started strong with a faster-than-average time in Running 1, but then he slowed down in Running 2. He regained some speed in Running 3 and Sled Pull, but experienced further slowdowns in Running 4, Running 5, and Running 8. This inconsistent pacing may have affected his overall performance.
Dee's profile appears to be more focused on strength rather than running. His best running lap was 00:03:13, which was 02:17 faster than the average. However, his total running time was 24:35 slower than average. This indicates that Dee should focus on improving his running abilities to enhance his overall performance in future races.
In conclusion, Dee Brouwer performed well in the 2022 Maastricht Hyrox race, but there are areas for improvement. To enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his running endurance, pacing, and transition time. Incorporating specific training strategies such as interval training, strength exercises, and form drills will help him address these areas and perform better in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wong Tsz Kit | 2024 Hong Kong | 02:04:05 | |
| Rinehart Seth | 2023 Houston | 02:04:38 | |
| Dry Michael | 2022 Dallas | 02:04:39 | |
| Lechner Florian | 2022 München | 02:04:39 | |
| Törnqvist Magnus | 2023 Stockholm | 02:04:37 | |
| Essig Michael | 2019 Karlsruhe | 02:04:11 | |
| Ng Leonard | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:04:19 | |
| Einwohner Ethan | 2023 New York | 02:04:41 | |
| Smith Stephen | 2024 Anaheim | 02:04:43 | |
| Cook Aaron | 2021 Chicago | 02:04:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
