Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 761 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bickerton Sharon's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bickerton Sharon's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bickerton Sharon's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bickerton Sharon's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:29 | 05:41 to 04:12 | 32.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:09 | 05:23 to 04:14 | 25.3% |
| Run Total | 01:00 | 39:34 to 38:34 | 22.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:40 | 04:15 to 03:35 | 14.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:01 to 01:46 | 5.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:40 to 01:40 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:56 to 02:56 | 0.0% |
| Bickerton Sharon | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:58 | 00:00 | 04:32 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 04:58 | 04:51 -00:16 | 04:32 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 09:33 | 04:47 +00:08 | 09:23 +00:10 |
| Sled Push | 01:40 | 14:28 | 02:24 -00:44 | 14:10 +00:18 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 16:08 | 05:01 -00:03 | 16:34 -00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:41 | 21:06 | 04:46 +00:55 | 21:35 -00:29 |
| Running 4 | 04:59 | 26:47 | 05:02 -00:03 | 26:21 +00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:23 | 31:46 | 04:47 +00:36 | 31:23 +00:23 |
| Running 5 | 05:02 | 37:09 | 05:08 -00:06 | 36:10 +00:59 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 42:11 | 05:04 -00:22 | 41:18 +00:53 |
| Running 6 | 05:00 | 46:53 | 05:04 -00:04 | 46:22 +00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 51:53 | 01:58 +00:03 | 51:26 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 04:47 | 53:54 | 05:03 -00:16 | 53:24 +00:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:15 | 58:41 | 03:53 +00:22 | 58:27 +00:14 |
| Running 8 | 04:58 | 01:02:56 | 05:20 -00:22 | 01:02:20 +00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 02:56 | 01:07:54 | 03:54 -00:58 | 01:07:40 +00:14 |
| Roxzone | 06:20 | 01:17:02 | 05:28 +00:52 | 01:17:02 |
Sharon Bickerton delivered an impressive performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing the top position in her age group and ranking 70th overall out of 1801 athletes. Her overall time of 01:17:02 places her among the top 3% of participants, showcasing her competitive edge. Notably, her total running time of 00:39:34 was 00:52 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, the detailed splits suggest that she may have started slightly slower than the average pace in the initial running segments. Sharon's performance suggests a hybrid profile, with strength in running but potential for improvement in specific functional exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dyer Vicki | 2023 Birmingham | 01:16:42 | |
| Henley Brittany | 2024 Melbourne | 01:16:46 | |
| Hilton Katy | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:16:36 | |
| Fuertes Karina | 2023 Barcelona | 01:17:04 | |
| Kafka Andrea | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:17:06 | |
| Codario Samantha | 2024 Dallas | 01:16:46 | |
| Western Charlotte | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:16:34 | |
| Di Fazio Angela | 2024 Rimini | 01:17:28 | |
| Chugani Aliya | 2021 Madrid | 01:16:39 | |
| Taggart Amy | 2024 London | 01:16:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
