Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Banson Zane's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Banson Zane's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Banson Zane's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Banson Zane's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 00:52 | 45:43 to 44:51 | 82.5% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:06 to 04:55 | 17.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 00:00 to 00:00 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:57 to 05:57 | 0.0% |
| Banson Zane | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:59 | 00:00 | 04:49 -01:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 02:59 | 04:33 -00:03 | 04:49 -01:50 |
| Running 2 | 05:34 | 07:29 | 05:18 +00:16 | 09:22 -01:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 13:03 | 03:08 -00:40 | 14:40 -01:37 |
| Running 3 | 06:05 | 15:31 | 05:46 +00:19 | 17:48 -02:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:45 | 21:36 | 05:24 -00:39 | 23:34 -01:58 |
| Running 4 | 06:03 | 26:21 | 05:46 +00:17 | 28:58 -02:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 32:24 | 06:00 -06:00 | 34:44 -02:20 |
| Running 5 | 06:12 | 32:24 | 05:58 +00:14 | 40:44 -08:20 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 38:36 | 04:58 +00:08 | 46:42 -08:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:51 | 43:42 | 05:49 +00:02 | 51:40 -07:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 49:33 | 02:22 -00:12 | 57:29 -07:56 |
| Running 7 | 05:44 | 51:43 | 05:47 -00:03 | 59:51 -08:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:21 | 57:27 | 05:37 -00:16 | 01:05:38 -08:11 |
| Running 8 | 07:19 | 01:02:48 | 06:35 +00:44 | 01:11:15 -08:27 |
| Wall Balls | 05:57 | 01:10:07 | 07:16 -01:19 | 01:17:50 -07:43 |
| Roxzone | 16:51 | 01:32:53 | 07:47 +09:04 | 01:32:53 |
Zane Banson delivered a commendable performance, ranking in the top 44% overall and top 48% in his age group during the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race. His overall time was 01:34:55, and he demonstrated particular strength in strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, both ranking in the top 15%. However, his Total Running Time was slower than average by 00:48, indicating a need for improvement in running efficiency. The analysis of his initial running segments suggests that Zane started at a moderate pace, with no significant deviation from the average. This indicates a balanced approach rather than a too-fast or too-slow start, suggesting a hybrid athlete profile with potential to improve running performance.
By focusing on these targeted training strategies and race-day tactics, Zane can enhance his performance in subsequent Hyrox races, balancing his running efficiency with his evident strength capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rogers Jeremy | 2024 Birmingham | 01:32:29 | |
| Brennan Jack | 2024 Madrid | 01:32:55 | |
| Hobbs Will | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:33:07 | |
| Da Silva Luiz | 2022 Dallas | 01:33:15 | |
| Kaak Mathias | 2022 Bremen | 01:33:17 | |
| Uwihs Bastian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:32:47 | |
| Pisano Justin | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:32:28 | |
| Schlünzen Mike | 2018 Hamburg | 01:33:08 | |
| Schnur Christian | 2019 Hannover | 01:32:31 | |
| Thomas Damestoy | 2023 Paris | 01:33:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
