Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Thompson Eddy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Thompson Eddy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Thompson Eddy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Thompson Eddy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:03 | 05:55 to 04:52 | 50.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:38 | 03:21 to 02:43 | 30.4% |
| Run Total | 00:22 | 42:11 to 41:49 | 17.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:01 | 05:03 to 05:02 | 0.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:04 to 02:03 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:36 to 05:36 | 0.0% |
| Thompson Eddy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:26 | 00:00 | 04:38 +00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 05:26 | 04:27 -00:13 | 04:38 +00:48 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 09:40 | 04:59 -00:14 | 09:05 +00:35 |
| Sled Push | 03:21 | 14:25 | 02:56 +00:25 | 14:04 +00:21 |
| Running 3 | 05:02 | 17:46 | 05:24 -00:22 | 17:00 +00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 04:27 | 22:48 | 05:00 -00:33 | 22:24 +00:24 |
| Running 4 | 04:51 | 27:15 | 05:24 -00:33 | 27:24 -00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 32:06 | 05:20 -00:17 | 32:48 -00:42 |
| Running 5 | 04:50 | 37:09 | 05:34 -00:44 | 38:08 -00:59 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 41:59 | 04:49 -00:15 | 43:42 -01:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:28 | 46:33 | 05:27 +00:01 | 48:31 -01:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 52:01 | 02:11 -00:07 | 53:58 -01:57 |
| Running 7 | 05:45 | 54:05 | 05:24 +00:21 | 56:09 -02:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:55 | 59:50 | 05:06 +00:49 | 01:01:33 -01:43 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:05:45 | 06:02 +00:07 | 01:06:39 -00:54 |
| Wall Balls | 05:36 | 01:11:54 | 06:33 -00:57 | 01:12:41 -00:47 |
| Roxzone | 08:49 | 01:26:10 | 06:56 +01:53 | 01:26:10 |
Eddy Thompson demonstrated a strong performance in the 2024 Madrid Hyrox Race, placing in the top 34% of all athletes and 37% in his age group of 30-34. Notably, Eddy's overall running time was faster than average, suggesting his proficiency towards running. He maintained a consistent pace throughout the race, although his starting pace during the first running segment was slightly slower than the average. This suggests that Eddy seems to have a runner profile, but he could benefit from a faster start.
For future races, Eddy could benefit from starting at a faster pace during the first running segment to gain an early time advantage. Additionally, focusing on improving his transition times between exercise zones could significantly enhance his overall performance. To capitalize on his running strength, Eddy should aim to maintain or increase his pace during the later running segments of the race. Lastly, integrating more strength training into his overall training regimen could help improve his performance in the strength-based segments of the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Morris Greg | 2020 Chicago | 01:26:33 | |
| Stiegler Mark | 2023 Melbourne | 01:26:13 | |
| Clark Laurence | 2023 London | 01:26:23 | |
| Gil Naveira Javier | 2024 Madrid | 01:26:15 | |
| Wallace Gavin | 2024 Dallas | 01:26:23 | |
| Cantwell Tom | 2024 Perth | 01:26:34 | |
| Brown Will | 2022 London | 01:26:30 | |
| Angehrn Oliver | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:25:46 | |
| Little Matthew | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:50 | |
| Brunjak Ivor | 2023 Barcelona | 01:26:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:23:56 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:50:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
