Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ramos Miguel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ramos Miguel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ramos Miguel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ramos Miguel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:02 | 40:57 to 37:55 | 56.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:41 | 05:50 to 05:09 | 12.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:40 | 04:52 to 04:12 | 12.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:31 | 04:31 to 04:00 | 9.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:31 | 04:41 to 04:10 | 9.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Ramos Miguel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 04:17 -00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 03:41 | 04:19 +00:33 | 04:17 -00:36 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 08:33 | 04:36 +00:30 | 08:36 -00:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:04 | 13:39 | 02:38 -00:34 | 13:12 +00:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 15:43 | 04:59 +00:11 | 15:50 -00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 20:53 | 04:24 +00:07 | 20:49 +00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 25:24 | 04:57 +00:16 | 25:13 +00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:52 | 30:37 | 04:36 -00:44 | 30:10 +00:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:19 | 34:29 | 05:05 +00:14 | 34:46 -00:17 |
| Rowing | 04:31 | 39:48 | 04:38 -00:07 | 39:51 -00:03 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 44:19 | 04:59 +00:25 | 44:29 -00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 49:43 | 01:59 -00:11 | 49:28 +00:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 51:31 | 04:58 +00:20 | 51:27 +00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:41 | 56:49 | 04:32 +00:09 | 56:25 +00:24 |
| Running 8 | 05:50 | 01:01:30 | 05:25 +00:25 | 01:00:57 +00:33 |
| Wall Balls | 05:50 | 01:07:20 | 05:42 +00:08 | 01:06:22 +00:58 |
| Roxzone | 04:55 | 01:17:57 | 05:53 -00:58 | 01:17:57 |
In the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, Miguel Ramos delivered a commendable performance, ranking in the top 18% overall and top 22% within his age group. His overall time was 01:17:57, with a total running time of 40:57, which was slightly slower than the average. This indicates that Miguel has a balanced profile, excelling in certain strength events like the Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump while needing improvement in others. Miguel's running times suggest a consistent pace, but with a slight slowdown in the middle segments, indicating potential fatigue management issues. His transition times in the roxzone were efficient, showcasing good overall fitness and transition capability.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Langemann Rudolf | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:18:21 | |
| Macdonald Darren | 2023 Glasgow | 01:18:00 | |
| Löcher Thomas | 2024 Köln | 01:17:57 | |
| Calafell Xavi | 2024 Malaga | 01:17:46 | |
| Loebig Jason | 2021 Chicago | 01:18:10 | |
| Barry Nick | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:44 | |
| Eaden Chris | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:56 | |
| Mcgreavy Liam | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:12 | |
| Kemp Tom | 2023 London | 01:18:24 | |
| Elvebakk Ole André | 2024 Stockholm | 01:18:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
